Login  |  Register  |  Contact

Repeat After Me: These Loss Numbers Are Meaningless

Article on the latest CSI/FBI study.

The study does not use a consistent loss model, thus the loss numbers over time are meaningless. I'm all for numbers, but we need an accurate model that won't just reflect who wants more money this year for more tools/people. Just estimating a lump sum for losses is a load of crap.

I've talked about similar problems with bad math here and here.

The trend is meaningless without more rigor in the study and some real loss models.

—Rich

Previous entry: Tutorial: How To Use Mac FileVault Safely | | Next entry: Off Topic: Every Time You Buy A Ringtone A Kitten Dies

Comments:

If you like to leave comments, and aren't a spammer, register for the site and email us at info@securosis.com and we'll turn off moderation for your account.

By scott  on  09/13  at  10:22 PM

I hope this isn’‘t just a case of too much ALE… :o)

Name:

Email:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: