Securosis

Research

Don’t Let the Rules Define Your Capabilities

As I’ve mentioned before, I’ve been doing martial arts for a while; most of my life if you count high school wrestling. I recently switched from Traditional Taekwon-Do to Karate after moving to Phoenix. One of the things I love about martial arts is how many lessons on life you can draw from it. I had another one of “those” experiences Tuesday night. Where I train is more than just a Karate dojo- there are three training floors with a bunch of different instructors from different arts; each a real instructor in their art, not just some dude with a black belt in one style, and 3 random classes under his belt in 8 others. A couple weeks ago they started a Mixed Martial Arts program (MMA). Yep, we’re talking Ultimate Fighting Champion! While I like to delude myself into thinking I’m too pretty to fight full contact at the ripe old age of 36, you can attend the class without going to the nose-bursting extreme. The combination of switching styles and playing with MMA really highlights something about most martial arts. While one goal of sparring is supposed to be a way to simulate a potential real-life fight, most arts end up constrained by whatever rules they decide on for sparring and tournament competition. Problem is that none of those rules exist in the real world. In TKD you can’t grab or throw, so there are a lot of high kicks and multiple kicks. In Karate you can do basic grabs and throws, so I quickly learned to pull that leg back in darn quick. But in Karate certain kinds of techniques don’t score, even though they could do some damage if they connected. For example, there’s something called a hook kick; I’ve noticed in Karate that the version taught is not a version you’d ever use for real- it’s totally worthless outside a tournament. Because of the rules, most tournament matches are won and lost off a few basic techniques, so that’s what you spend most of your time on in class. It’s the same for pretty much everything- boxers don’t have to worry about takedowns or kicks. Wrestlers don’t have to worry about getting kneed in the face. No one has to worry about getting kicked in the nads or fighting more than one person at a time. As one of my instructors in Colorado puts it, “any martial art is only as realistic as the last time it was used in combat”. In nearly every martial art I’ve trained in, the rules for sparring and tournaments have a dramatic influence over the techniques a student learns. Even MMA has rules, and being more of a sport than a specific martial art those rules define how people train, and how you train defines how you will react- be it in the ring or on the street. Now most of us don’t get into all that many street fights anymore, but this is one of those analogies that easily extends. For example, how many of you, in your day to day job, expect your customers to behave according to the arbitrary rules of your business and become upset when they act differently? A customer/client/john might ask you for something simple outside your normal process, and even if it’s easy, even if it’s beneficial to both of you, even if it doesn’t violate policy, your instinct will be to say no. Why? Because you don’t think you can do it. You’ve allowed arbitrary rules to define your capabilities. As Rob Tobin, another master instructor (and great friend who died long before his time) once said while we were doing some business together, “don’t make it hard for people to give you money”. And the worst culprit? Compliance, but I’m not going to talk about that here. As a martial artist I constantly strive to train according to the rules without letting them limit my capabilities. To be honest, it’s a lot easier to do on the training floor than in my professional and personal lives. Keep it real. Share:

Share:
Read Post
dinosaur-sidebar

Totally Transparent Research is the embodiment of how we work at Securosis. It’s our core operating philosophy, our research policy, and a specific process. We initially developed it to help maintain objectivity while producing licensed research, but its benefits extend to all aspects of our business.

Going beyond Open Source Research, and a far cry from the traditional syndicated research model, we think it’s the best way to produce independent, objective, quality research.

Here’s how it works:

  • Content is developed ‘live’ on the blog. Primary research is generally released in pieces, as a series of posts, so we can digest and integrate feedback, making the end results much stronger than traditional “ivory tower” research.
  • Comments are enabled for posts. All comments are kept except for spam, personal insults of a clearly inflammatory nature, and completely off-topic content that distracts from the discussion. We welcome comments critical of the work, even if somewhat insulting to the authors. Really.
  • Anyone can comment, and no registration is required. Vendors or consultants with a relevant product or offering must properly identify themselves. While their comments won’t be deleted, the writer/moderator will “call out”, identify, and possibly ridicule vendors who fail to do so.
  • Vendors considering licensing the content are welcome to provide feedback, but it must be posted in the comments - just like everyone else. There is no back channel influence on the research findings or posts.
    Analysts must reply to comments and defend the research position, or agree to modify the content.
  • At the end of the post series, the analyst compiles the posts into a paper, presentation, or other delivery vehicle. Public comments/input factors into the research, where appropriate.
  • If the research is distributed as a paper, significant commenters/contributors are acknowledged in the opening of the report. If they did not post their real names, handles used for comments are listed. Commenters do not retain any rights to the report, but their contributions will be recognized.
  • All primary research will be released under a Creative Commons license. The current license is Non-Commercial, Attribution. The analyst, at their discretion, may add a Derivative Works or Share Alike condition.
  • Securosis primary research does not discuss specific vendors or specific products/offerings, unless used to provide context, contrast or to make a point (which is very very rare).
    Although quotes from published primary research (and published primary research only) may be used in press releases, said quotes may never mention a specific vendor, even if the vendor is mentioned in the source report. Securosis must approve any quote to appear in any vendor marketing collateral.
  • Final primary research will be posted on the blog with open comments.
  • Research will be updated periodically to reflect market realities, based on the discretion of the primary analyst. Updated research will be dated and given a version number.
    For research that cannot be developed using this model, such as complex principles or models that are unsuited for a series of blog posts, the content will be chunked up and posted at or before release of the paper to solicit public feedback, and provide an open venue for comments and criticisms.
  • In rare cases Securosis may write papers outside of the primary research agenda, but only if the end result can be non-biased and valuable to the user community to supplement industry-wide efforts or advances. A “Radically Transparent Research” process will be followed in developing these papers, where absolutely all materials are public at all stages of development, including communications (email, call notes).
    Only the free primary research released on our site can be licensed. We will not accept licensing fees on research we charge users to access.
  • All licensed research will be clearly labeled with the licensees. No licensed research will be released without indicating the sources of licensing fees. Again, there will be no back channel influence. We’re open and transparent about our revenue sources.

In essence, we develop all of our research out in the open, and not only seek public comments, but keep those comments indefinitely as a record of the research creation process. If you believe we are biased or not doing our homework, you can call us out on it and it will be there in the record. Our philosophy involves cracking open the research process, and using our readers to eliminate bias and enhance the quality of the work.

On the back end, here’s how we handle this approach with licensees:

  • Licensees may propose paper topics. The topic may be accepted if it is consistent with the Securosis research agenda and goals, but only if it can be covered without bias and will be valuable to the end user community.
  • Analysts produce research according to their own research agendas, and may offer licensing under the same objectivity requirements.
  • The potential licensee will be provided an outline of our research positions and the potential research product so they can determine if it is likely to meet their objectives.
  • Once the licensee agrees, development of the primary research content begins, following the Totally Transparent Research process as outlined above. At this point, there is no money exchanged.
  • Upon completion of the paper, the licensee will receive a release candidate to determine whether the final result still meets their needs.
  • If the content does not meet their needs, the licensee is not required to pay, and the research will be released without licensing or with alternate licensees.
  • Licensees may host and reuse the content for the length of the license (typically one year). This includes placing the content behind a registration process, posting on white paper networks, or translation into other languages. The research will always be hosted at Securosis for free without registration.

Here is the language we currently place in our research project agreements:

Content will be created independently of LICENSEE with no obligations for payment. Once content is complete, LICENSEE will have a 3 day review period to determine if the content meets corporate objectives. If the content is unsuitable, LICENSEE will not be obligated for any payment and Securosis is free to distribute the whitepaper without branding or with alternate licensees, and will not complete any associated webcasts for the declining LICENSEE. Content licensing, webcasts and payment are contingent on the content being acceptable to LICENSEE. This maintains objectivity while limiting the risk to LICENSEE. Securosis maintains all rights to the content and to include Securosis branding in addition to any licensee branding.

Even this process itself is open to criticism. If you have questions or comments, you can email us or comment on the blog.