Securosis

Research

What Drives Security Innovation?

According to the time tracking feature of my Wii (which you can’t disable, nice parental feature), I played 3 hours and 46 minutes of Guitar Hero III last night after picking it up at Target. I have to fully admit I was skeptical of the whole Guitar Hero thing when it first came out, but it’s incredibly addictive. And not just when I’m drunk at a Christmas party. Not that I’d drink at a Christmas party and play video games. That wouldn’t be proper behavior for a non-practicing Jew. I’ve been gaming my entire life but have definitely strayed the past few years. Sure, there was plenty of compelling game content, but nothing really innovative. I don’t have the time for something like World of Warcraft, and some of the coolest games were so difficult that us mere mortals who just wanted to pick them up for an hour or two a week were totally excluded. Then comes the Wii, where the simplest of games take no learning but entertain for hours on end. Sure, the graphics aren’t that great, but that’s not the point. I’m loving that I can pick it up for 15 minutes and actually get something out of it; be it a quick game of te is, a few rounds of golf, or a couple of songs on the guitar. Nintendo rethought gaming and made it fun again. For everyone, not just the hard core. Oh wait, this is my security blog. Got it, so what the heck does the Wii have to do with security? Other than fuzzing the browser? Innovation my friends, innovation. (This post is inspired by some conversations over the past few months with Chris Hoff, based on his disruptive innovation series). Nintendo knew they couldn’t beat Sony and Microsoft head-on, so they tossed out the rules and changed the game. By focusing on casual gaming and a younger audience they didn’t fight for existing market share- they grew the entire market. Innovation in business is nearly always driven by the same need- competitive advantage. Either you innovate to create it, innovate to regain it, or innovate to increase efficiency and thus profitability. Nintendo made two major breaks with the rest of the industry- they designed a console they could sell at a profit out of the gate (MS and Sony lose money on every box and make it up with games). Then they changed the entire game interaction mechanism to appeal to a wider audience. But security follows different rules. We have very little control of the environment around us in security. As much as we like to get ahead of the game, we are responsive by the nature of our mission. Innovation is driven through three needs: Improving Efficiency: The one driver we share with the business. By increasing efficiency, we reduce costs and improve effectiveness, thus contributing to the bottom line. Responding to Threats: The bad guys are just like a business- they innovate to improve the top line, but at the expense of our bottom line. We can never fully predict their innovation, and as they come up with new attacks we are forced to respond with new defenses. Responding to Business Innovation: Just as the bad guys are looking for competitive advantage, so are the businesses we support. They adopt new technologies before we’re fully able to understand and protect them. Just when we have our program operationalized, someone comes up with a new business initiative (Web 2.0 anyone?) or internal technology. Most pundits (and startups, and investors, and…) fail to accurately predict the future of security because they fail to account for all three drivers. Most often, they look at pure threats without accounting for either efficiency or business innovation. Or, they look at business innovation solely as a threat, rather than an opportunity for security innovation (or the related problem- by the time they recognize the business innovation it’s already in production, and thus a new risk/threat). When you look at security innovation, either to predict next year’s budget or to predict the market in three years, study the world around you. Understand your business and general technology trends as deeply as the threats. Pay particular attention to business technology trends, like the consumerization of IT, that change the game. In many cases we can make decisions today that make our lives much easier when that business or threat innovation is in full swing. It’s your opportunity to get ahead of the curve and look like a freaking genius. < p style=”text-align:right;font-size:10px;”>Technorati Tags: Security Innovation Share:

Share:
Read Post

Totally Transparent Research is the embodiment of how we work at Securosis. It’s our core operating philosophy, our research policy, and a specific process. We initially developed it to help maintain objectivity while producing licensed research, but its benefits extend to all aspects of our business.

Going beyond Open Source Research, and a far cry from the traditional syndicated research model, we think it’s the best way to produce independent, objective, quality research.

Here’s how it works:

  • Content is developed ‘live’ on the blog. Primary research is generally released in pieces, as a series of posts, so we can digest and integrate feedback, making the end results much stronger than traditional “ivory tower” research.
  • Comments are enabled for posts. All comments are kept except for spam, personal insults of a clearly inflammatory nature, and completely off-topic content that distracts from the discussion. We welcome comments critical of the work, even if somewhat insulting to the authors. Really.
  • Anyone can comment, and no registration is required. Vendors or consultants with a relevant product or offering must properly identify themselves. While their comments won’t be deleted, the writer/moderator will “call out”, identify, and possibly ridicule vendors who fail to do so.
  • Vendors considering licensing the content are welcome to provide feedback, but it must be posted in the comments - just like everyone else. There is no back channel influence on the research findings or posts.
    Analysts must reply to comments and defend the research position, or agree to modify the content.
  • At the end of the post series, the analyst compiles the posts into a paper, presentation, or other delivery vehicle. Public comments/input factors into the research, where appropriate.
  • If the research is distributed as a paper, significant commenters/contributors are acknowledged in the opening of the report. If they did not post their real names, handles used for comments are listed. Commenters do not retain any rights to the report, but their contributions will be recognized.
  • All primary research will be released under a Creative Commons license. The current license is Non-Commercial, Attribution. The analyst, at their discretion, may add a Derivative Works or Share Alike condition.
  • Securosis primary research does not discuss specific vendors or specific products/offerings, unless used to provide context, contrast or to make a point (which is very very rare).
    Although quotes from published primary research (and published primary research only) may be used in press releases, said quotes may never mention a specific vendor, even if the vendor is mentioned in the source report. Securosis must approve any quote to appear in any vendor marketing collateral.
  • Final primary research will be posted on the blog with open comments.
  • Research will be updated periodically to reflect market realities, based on the discretion of the primary analyst. Updated research will be dated and given a version number.
    For research that cannot be developed using this model, such as complex principles or models that are unsuited for a series of blog posts, the content will be chunked up and posted at or before release of the paper to solicit public feedback, and provide an open venue for comments and criticisms.
  • In rare cases Securosis may write papers outside of the primary research agenda, but only if the end result can be non-biased and valuable to the user community to supplement industry-wide efforts or advances. A “Radically Transparent Research” process will be followed in developing these papers, where absolutely all materials are public at all stages of development, including communications (email, call notes).
    Only the free primary research released on our site can be licensed. We will not accept licensing fees on research we charge users to access.
  • All licensed research will be clearly labeled with the licensees. No licensed research will be released without indicating the sources of licensing fees. Again, there will be no back channel influence. We’re open and transparent about our revenue sources.

In essence, we develop all of our research out in the open, and not only seek public comments, but keep those comments indefinitely as a record of the research creation process. If you believe we are biased or not doing our homework, you can call us out on it and it will be there in the record. Our philosophy involves cracking open the research process, and using our readers to eliminate bias and enhance the quality of the work.

On the back end, here’s how we handle this approach with licensees:

  • Licensees may propose paper topics. The topic may be accepted if it is consistent with the Securosis research agenda and goals, but only if it can be covered without bias and will be valuable to the end user community.
  • Analysts produce research according to their own research agendas, and may offer licensing under the same objectivity requirements.
  • The potential licensee will be provided an outline of our research positions and the potential research product so they can determine if it is likely to meet their objectives.
  • Once the licensee agrees, development of the primary research content begins, following the Totally Transparent Research process as outlined above. At this point, there is no money exchanged.
  • Upon completion of the paper, the licensee will receive a release candidate to determine whether the final result still meets their needs.
  • If the content does not meet their needs, the licensee is not required to pay, and the research will be released without licensing or with alternate licensees.
  • Licensees may host and reuse the content for the length of the license (typically one year). This includes placing the content behind a registration process, posting on white paper networks, or translation into other languages. The research will always be hosted at Securosis for free without registration.

Here is the language we currently place in our research project agreements:

Content will be created independently of LICENSEE with no obligations for payment. Once content is complete, LICENSEE will have a 3 day review period to determine if the content meets corporate objectives. If the content is unsuitable, LICENSEE will not be obligated for any payment and Securosis is free to distribute the whitepaper without branding or with alternate licensees, and will not complete any associated webcasts for the declining LICENSEE. Content licensing, webcasts and payment are contingent on the content being acceptable to LICENSEE. This maintains objectivity while limiting the risk to LICENSEE. Securosis maintains all rights to the content and to include Securosis branding in addition to any licensee branding.

Even this process itself is open to criticism. If you have questions or comments, you can email us or comment on the blog.