Securosis

Menu

Research

Incite 11/24/2010: Fan Appreciation

Mike Rothman November 24, 2010 2 Comments

Though I have tailed off a bit from my ridiculous pace of two years ago, I still go see a lot of live music. Although many of these acts make a mint, it’s not an easy life. I can only imagine how difficult it is to be on the road for months at a time. It’s hard enough for me, and I’m only gone one or two nights at a time. Though it’s not like I’m staying at the Ritz every night (don’t tell Rich I’m staying at the Ritz, okay?). But there are examples of bands that do a job and earn their money every night. Let me highlight two great examples. First off, I saw Green Day during the summer. Those guys are one of the biggest bands in the world right now, but they haven’t forgotten where they came from. They played for almost 3 hours, had folks doing stage dives, and even gave a guitar to a lucky audience member. At one point they all dressed in drag for a few laughs. And repeatedly they made the point about how much they appreciated their fans and that they give everything every night to make sure the fans get their money’s worth. They know that seeing a rock concert is a luxury for many people, and are grateful their fans choose to spend money they may not have to see them play music. Next I’ll highlight Styx. I saw them a few weeks ago on their Grand Illusion/Pieces of Eight tour. They played each album in its entirety and it was like stepping into a time machine. These guys haven’t had a hit record in decades, but they are able to travel around and play their classics year after year. And folks like me show up every time, which I assume provides a decent living for guys who probably carry AARP cards. They get how lucky they are and they play like it. It was a great show. I guess my point is that we all have fans, whatever that definition is. Folks who allow you to do what you do. Do you appreciate them? Really? In the day to day mayhem of deadlines and other demands, I need to remember that without our readers and contributors, I wouldn’t be able to do what I love. With Thanksgiving coming up, I want to let you know how appreciative I am. For all of you who read our stuff, who show up when we pontificate, and who ask for our advice, thank you. I know I speak for Rich and Adrian as well. We know how good we have it, and that’s because of you. So before you take off for the long weekend (if you are in the US, anyway), make sure your fans know you appreciate them. I know they’d appreciate being appreciated. Photo credits: “Starsky & Hutch Appreciation Fan Club originally uploaded by Ged Carroll Incite 4 U Truth in advertising? – Stop reading this and click this link. Read the words in the picture very carefully. Doesn’t it make a pretty acronym? Mike is pretty slow, so I’ll spell it out. The first letters of McAfee’s three attributes (Focused, Unwavering, & Dedicated) spell out FUD. Really. You have to see it to believe it. I have a really hard time believing this was completely accidental, and nobody at McAfee was sniggering when they came up with it. Perhaps some marketing wonk misunderstood the meaning. Perhaps someone knew what they were doing, and wanted to see if they could pull a fast one. Perhaps this was a Titanic example of proofreading FAIL. I actually saw that while driving to my hotel for an appointment today, but only off in the distance when I couldn’t read it. Anyway, I suspect it won’t be up for long, which is too bad because it shows a heck of a sense of humor. Maybe. – RM Why bother? – The SQL Server 2008 option for massively parallel servers is going to be late. Actually, it’s already late, but it’s going to be even late-er-er or something like that. But the question in my mind is why? Why play this game at all? Why try to be the biggest and fastest relational database out there when performance benchmarks have not been a major buying considerations for databases in 15 years. Teradata has a killer database that scales great … but it’s not exactly dominating the market. Look at super-fast databases and database hardware providers historically, and tell me how they have generally done. Ant? Sequent? Yeah, exactly. I can see why Microsoft would like to be a player in that lucrative field, but the number of firms willing to spend $40k per processor on giant mission critical transaction processing systems is dwindling. BI and data warehousing is moving to generic cloud based non-relational data stores that perform 10 to 100 times better, but can be leased at fractions of the price. And the requirements of the data warehousing market are changing. My guess is that cloud services will be “good enough”, and this will be a case where “cheap, fast, and easy” cuts the massively parallel server market down before Microsoft arrives on the scene. – AL Ray Noorda rolls in his grave… – Like Shimmy, I remember when Novell was the king of networking. In fact, I cut my teeth on a Novell LAN (Token Ring, in fact) and am happy to say I have a CNE (that lapsed probably 20 years ago). But Novell is no more. It’s being acquired by Attachmate for a cool $2.2 billion. And that doesn’t seem to include some intellectual property that Microsoft is buying. It seems Attachmate is becoming a friendly CA, in that they buy mature, slow-growth businesses with big customer bases and the associated maintenance streams. Novell does compete in some growth markets like Identity Management, SIEM, and desktop management – but really the private equity guys are using leverage to buy cash flow. It’s a good model for the investors – not sure for customers.

Share:
Read Post
dinosaur-sidebar

Research

view all

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Totally Transparent Research is the embodiment of how we work at Securosis. It’s our core operating philosophy, our research policy, and a specific process. We initially developed it to help maintain objectivity while producing licensed research, but its benefits extend to all aspects of our business.

Going beyond Open Source Research, and a far cry from the traditional syndicated research model, we think it’s the best way to produce independent, objective, quality research.

Here’s how it works:

  • Content is developed ‘live’ on the blog. Primary research is generally released in pieces, as a series of posts, so we can digest and integrate feedback, making the end results much stronger than traditional “ivory tower” research.
  • Comments are enabled for posts. All comments are kept except for spam, personal insults of a clearly inflammatory nature, and completely off-topic content that distracts from the discussion. We welcome comments critical of the work, even if somewhat insulting to the authors. Really.
  • Anyone can comment, and no registration is required. Vendors or consultants with a relevant product or offering must properly identify themselves. While their comments won’t be deleted, the writer/moderator will “call out”, identify, and possibly ridicule vendors who fail to do so.
  • Vendors considering licensing the content are welcome to provide feedback, but it must be posted in the comments - just like everyone else. There is no back channel influence on the research findings or posts.
    Analysts must reply to comments and defend the research position, or agree to modify the content.
  • At the end of the post series, the analyst compiles the posts into a paper, presentation, or other delivery vehicle. Public comments/input factors into the research, where appropriate.
  • If the research is distributed as a paper, significant commenters/contributors are acknowledged in the opening of the report. If they did not post their real names, handles used for comments are listed. Commenters do not retain any rights to the report, but their contributions will be recognized.
  • All primary research will be released under a Creative Commons license. The current license is Non-Commercial, Attribution. The analyst, at their discretion, may add a Derivative Works or Share Alike condition.
  • Securosis primary research does not discuss specific vendors or specific products/offerings, unless used to provide context, contrast or to make a point (which is very very rare).
    Although quotes from published primary research (and published primary research only) may be used in press releases, said quotes may never mention a specific vendor, even if the vendor is mentioned in the source report. Securosis must approve any quote to appear in any vendor marketing collateral.
  • Final primary research will be posted on the blog with open comments.
  • Research will be updated periodically to reflect market realities, based on the discretion of the primary analyst. Updated research will be dated and given a version number.
    For research that cannot be developed using this model, such as complex principles or models that are unsuited for a series of blog posts, the content will be chunked up and posted at or before release of the paper to solicit public feedback, and provide an open venue for comments and criticisms.
  • In rare cases Securosis may write papers outside of the primary research agenda, but only if the end result can be non-biased and valuable to the user community to supplement industry-wide efforts or advances. A “Radically Transparent Research” process will be followed in developing these papers, where absolutely all materials are public at all stages of development, including communications (email, call notes).
    Only the free primary research released on our site can be licensed. We will not accept licensing fees on research we charge users to access.
  • All licensed research will be clearly labeled with the licensees. No licensed research will be released without indicating the sources of licensing fees. Again, there will be no back channel influence. We’re open and transparent about our revenue sources.

In essence, we develop all of our research out in the open, and not only seek public comments, but keep those comments indefinitely as a record of the research creation process. If you believe we are biased or not doing our homework, you can call us out on it and it will be there in the record. Our philosophy involves cracking open the research process, and using our readers to eliminate bias and enhance the quality of the work.

On the back end, here’s how we handle this approach with licensees:

  • Licensees may propose paper topics. The topic may be accepted if it is consistent with the Securosis research agenda and goals, but only if it can be covered without bias and will be valuable to the end user community.
  • Analysts produce research according to their own research agendas, and may offer licensing under the same objectivity requirements.
  • The potential licensee will be provided an outline of our research positions and the potential research product so they can determine if it is likely to meet their objectives.
  • Once the licensee agrees, development of the primary research content begins, following the Totally Transparent Research process as outlined above. At this point, there is no money exchanged.
  • Upon completion of the paper, the licensee will receive a release candidate to determine whether the final result still meets their needs.
  • If the content does not meet their needs, the licensee is not required to pay, and the research will be released without licensing or with alternate licensees.
  • Licensees may host and reuse the content for the length of the license (typically one year). This includes placing the content behind a registration process, posting on white paper networks, or translation into other languages. The research will always be hosted at Securosis for free without registration.

Here is the language we currently place in our research project agreements:

“Content will be created independently of LICENSEE with no obligations for payment. Once content is complete, LICENSEE will have a 3 day review period to determine if the content meets corporate objectives. If the content is unsuitable, LICENSEE will not be obligated for any payment and Securosis is free to distribute the whitepaper without branding or with alternate licensees, and will not complete any associated webcasts for the declining LICENSEE. Content licensing, webcasts and payment are contingent on the content being acceptable to LICENSEE. This maintains objectivity while limiting the risk to LICENSEE. Securosis maintains all rights to the content and to include Securosis branding in addition to any licensee branding.”

Even this process itself is open to criticism. If you have questions or comments, you can email us or comment on the blog.