Friday Summary: August 19, 2011

Here’s to the neighbors. I live in a rural area with a pretty low population density and 1.5 acre lot minimum. My closest neighbor is 60 feet away – most are over 300 feet or more. The area is really quiet. Usually all you can hear are birds. You can see the Milky Way at night. On any given day I may see javelina, coyotes, horny toads, road runners, vultures, hawks, barn owls, cottontails, jackrabbits, ground squirrels, mice, scorpions, one of a half-dozen varieties of snake, and a dozen varieties of birds. If you like nature, it’s a neat place to live. I am very fortunate that the house closest mine is owned by the world’s best neighbor. That’s not some coffee mug slogan – he’s just cool! He always has some incredible project going on – from welding custom turbo brackets to his friend’s drag bike, to machining a custom suspension for his truck from raw blocks of steel. His wife’s cool. And he has the same hobbies I do. He listens to the same radio stations. He drinks the same beer I do. If you need something he’s there to help. When the tree blew over between our properties, he was there to help me prop it back up. When my wife’s car got a flat during my last business trip, he put down his dinner and fixed it as if it was the evening’s entertainment. Every week I drop by with a six pack and we sit in his gi-normous garage/machine shop, and talk about whatever. Living next to the world’s best neighbor was offset by three of the 5 other residents within shouting range being asshats. Yeah, I hate to say it, but they were. Quiet, keep-to-themselves folks, but highly disagreeable and dysfunctional. My mean neighbor – mean until he got cancer, then he got really nice just before he left – was foreclosed on after 2 years struggling with the bank. My really mean neighbor – and I mean the North American pit viper cheat-little-children-out-of-their-lunch-money variety – died. Since snakey left his money to his kids, his lovely new wife could no longer afford the house, and was forced to sell to make ends meet. The neighbor behind me – let’s call him packrat, because he’s never seen a pile of junk he did not want to hoard – was also foreclosed on. After rummaging in his own trash for several months looking for scrap metal to sell, packrat smashed up cars, trailers, camper shells, ATVs, and construction supplies with his backhoe. Selling trash and trashing valuables is a special kind of mental illness. He even did me a favor and knocked over my trees by the property line so I have a full view of the debris field. While I am never happy to see people lose their homes, especially given the banking shenanigans going on all around us, I am in some small way a beneficiary. The bad neighbors are gone and the new neighbors are really nice! The people who replaced snakey are very pleasant. The neighbors across the street are wonderful – I helped them move some of their belongings and ended up talking and drinking beer till the sun went down. And while I am going to have to look at the junk pile behind me for a long time – nobody will be moving into the rat’s nest for some time – no neighbor is better than a deranged one. It dawned on me that, surrounded by nice people, I am now the un-cool neighbor. Oh, well. I plan to throw a party for the block to welcome them – and hopefully they will overlook my snarky personality. On to the Summary: Webcasts, Podcasts, Outside Writing, and Conferences Rick and Martin on NetSec Podcast. Adrian’s DR post on Database Auditing. Mike’s DR post on DefCon Kids. Adrian quoted on PCI Council’s guidance on tokenization. Adrian quoted on tokenization. Favorite Securosis Posts Mike Rothman: Hammers and Homomorphic Encryption. Something about saying “homomorphic” makes me laugh. Yes, I’m a two year old… Adrian Lane: Proxies and the Cloud (Public and Private). Yes, you can encrypt SaaS via proxy. It works but it’s clunky. And fragile. Rich: Security Management 2.0: Time to Replace Your SIEM? (new series). This is going to be an awesome series. David Mortman: New White Paper: Tokenization vs. Encryption. Dave Lewis: Nothing Changed: Black Hat’s Impact on ICS Security. Other Securosis Posts Incite 8/17/2011: Back to School. Friday Summary: August 12, 2011. Favorite Outside Posts Mike Rothman: Stop Coddling the Super-Rich. Buffett is the man. No, Rich, Warren. But if we tax the super wealthy more, they may not donate as much to the campaign funds. Dave Lewis: The Three Laws Of Security Professionals. Adrian Lane: 15 Years of Software Security: Looking Back and Looking Forward. I met Adam around this time – and used to pass that guide out to my programming team. David Mortman: Nymwars: Thoughts on Google+. Project Quant Posts DB Quant: Index. NSO Quant: Index of Posts. NSO Quant: Health Metrics–Device Health. NSO Quant: Manage Metrics–Monitor Issues/Tune IDS/IPS. NSO Quant: Manage Metrics–Deploy and Audit/Validate. NSO Quant: Manage Metrics–Process Change Request and Test/Approve. Research Reports and Presentations Tokenization vs. Encryption: Options for Compliance. Security Benchmarking: Going Beyond Metrics. Understanding and Selecting a File Activity Monitoring Solution. Database Activity Monitoring: Software vs. Appliance. React Faster and Better: New Approaches for Advanced Incident Response. Top News and Posts Spyeye Source ‘Leaked’. BART Blocks Cell Services. Anonymous says ‘F-U’. Beware of Juice-Jacking. Funny – but how many people forget these are just USB connectors? New Attack on AES. AES is hardly doomed by this, but any progress beating the most popular symmetric cipher is important. Persistent Flash Cookies. Microsoft Security Program & Vulnerability Data Now Available. German hacker collective expels OpenLeaks founder. On immigration, a step in the right direction. IT Admin Hacker Caught By McDonald’s Purchase. Don’t just read the headline on this one – look at

Read Post

Totally Transparent Research is the embodiment of how we work at Securosis. It’s our core operating philosophy, our research policy, and a specific process. We initially developed it to help maintain objectivity while producing licensed research, but its benefits extend to all aspects of our business.

Going beyond Open Source Research, and a far cry from the traditional syndicated research model, we think it’s the best way to produce independent, objective, quality research.

Here’s how it works:

  • Content is developed ‘live’ on the blog. Primary research is generally released in pieces, as a series of posts, so we can digest and integrate feedback, making the end results much stronger than traditional “ivory tower” research.
  • Comments are enabled for posts. All comments are kept except for spam, personal insults of a clearly inflammatory nature, and completely off-topic content that distracts from the discussion. We welcome comments critical of the work, even if somewhat insulting to the authors. Really.
  • Anyone can comment, and no registration is required. Vendors or consultants with a relevant product or offering must properly identify themselves. While their comments won’t be deleted, the writer/moderator will “call out”, identify, and possibly ridicule vendors who fail to do so.
  • Vendors considering licensing the content are welcome to provide feedback, but it must be posted in the comments - just like everyone else. There is no back channel influence on the research findings or posts.
    Analysts must reply to comments and defend the research position, or agree to modify the content.
  • At the end of the post series, the analyst compiles the posts into a paper, presentation, or other delivery vehicle. Public comments/input factors into the research, where appropriate.
  • If the research is distributed as a paper, significant commenters/contributors are acknowledged in the opening of the report. If they did not post their real names, handles used for comments are listed. Commenters do not retain any rights to the report, but their contributions will be recognized.
  • All primary research will be released under a Creative Commons license. The current license is Non-Commercial, Attribution. The analyst, at their discretion, may add a Derivative Works or Share Alike condition.
  • Securosis primary research does not discuss specific vendors or specific products/offerings, unless used to provide context, contrast or to make a point (which is very very rare).
    Although quotes from published primary research (and published primary research only) may be used in press releases, said quotes may never mention a specific vendor, even if the vendor is mentioned in the source report. Securosis must approve any quote to appear in any vendor marketing collateral.
  • Final primary research will be posted on the blog with open comments.
  • Research will be updated periodically to reflect market realities, based on the discretion of the primary analyst. Updated research will be dated and given a version number.
    For research that cannot be developed using this model, such as complex principles or models that are unsuited for a series of blog posts, the content will be chunked up and posted at or before release of the paper to solicit public feedback, and provide an open venue for comments and criticisms.
  • In rare cases Securosis may write papers outside of the primary research agenda, but only if the end result can be non-biased and valuable to the user community to supplement industry-wide efforts or advances. A “Radically Transparent Research” process will be followed in developing these papers, where absolutely all materials are public at all stages of development, including communications (email, call notes).
    Only the free primary research released on our site can be licensed. We will not accept licensing fees on research we charge users to access.
  • All licensed research will be clearly labeled with the licensees. No licensed research will be released without indicating the sources of licensing fees. Again, there will be no back channel influence. We’re open and transparent about our revenue sources.

In essence, we develop all of our research out in the open, and not only seek public comments, but keep those comments indefinitely as a record of the research creation process. If you believe we are biased or not doing our homework, you can call us out on it and it will be there in the record. Our philosophy involves cracking open the research process, and using our readers to eliminate bias and enhance the quality of the work.

On the back end, here’s how we handle this approach with licensees:

  • Licensees may propose paper topics. The topic may be accepted if it is consistent with the Securosis research agenda and goals, but only if it can be covered without bias and will be valuable to the end user community.
  • Analysts produce research according to their own research agendas, and may offer licensing under the same objectivity requirements.
  • The potential licensee will be provided an outline of our research positions and the potential research product so they can determine if it is likely to meet their objectives.
  • Once the licensee agrees, development of the primary research content begins, following the Totally Transparent Research process as outlined above. At this point, there is no money exchanged.
  • Upon completion of the paper, the licensee will receive a release candidate to determine whether the final result still meets their needs.
  • If the content does not meet their needs, the licensee is not required to pay, and the research will be released without licensing or with alternate licensees.
  • Licensees may host and reuse the content for the length of the license (typically one year). This includes placing the content behind a registration process, posting on white paper networks, or translation into other languages. The research will always be hosted at Securosis for free without registration.

Here is the language we currently place in our research project agreements:

Content will be created independently of LICENSEE with no obligations for payment. Once content is complete, LICENSEE will have a 3 day review period to determine if the content meets corporate objectives. If the content is unsuitable, LICENSEE will not be obligated for any payment and Securosis is free to distribute the whitepaper without branding or with alternate licensees, and will not complete any associated webcasts for the declining LICENSEE. Content licensing, webcasts and payment are contingent on the content being acceptable to LICENSEE. This maintains objectivity while limiting the risk to LICENSEE. Securosis maintains all rights to the content and to include Securosis branding in addition to any licensee branding.

Even this process itself is open to criticism. If you have questions or comments, you can email us or comment on the blog.