Securosis

Research

Incite 11/30/2011: An Introverted Thanks

As with most things, I have mixed feelings about the holidays. Who doesn’t enjoy a few days off to recharge for the end-of-year rush? But the holidays also mean family, and that’s a good thing in limited doses. I’m one of the lucky few who gets along with my in-laws. They have an inexplicably high opinion of me, and who am I to say they are wrong? But by the fifth day of being surrounded by family over Thanksgiving weekend I was fit to be tied. I spent most of Saturday grumbling on the couch, snapping at anyone who would listen. And even those who didn’t. Thankfully my family ignores me, and suggested I stay back when they went to the fitness center pool. I was much better when they got back. I was able to recharge my social batteries – I just needed a little solitary confinement. Why? Because I’m an introvert – like all introverts, the longer I’m around people the harder it is for me to deal. I found this great guide to dealing with introverts from The Atlantic, and it’s right on the money. I like to say I’m anti-social but that’s really not the case. But I only enjoy people in limited doses. I remember reading, a few years back, Never Eat Alone, a guide to networking. There is a lot of great stuff in that book, which I will never do. I actually like to eat alone, so most days I do. That’s really what I’m thankful for this year. I have a situation where I can be around people enough, but not too much. For me that’s essential. But that’s not all I’m thankful for. I’m thankful for all the folks who read our stuff, who have bought my book, and who show up to hear us pontificate. When I explain what I do for a living most folks say, “really?” For the record, nobody is more surprised than me that I can write and speak every day and pay my bills. It’s really a great gig. So thank you for supporting our efforts. And I’m also thankful that the important people in my life tolerate me. Obviously Rich and Adrian are getting used to my, uh, quirks. They haven’t voted me off the island. Yet. My kids are growing into wonderful people despite their genetically similarity to me. They continue to amaze me (almost) daily, and usually in a good way. But most of all, I have to thank the Boss. We just celebrated our 15th year of marriage, and although there have been a number of great days in my life, the day we met is in the Top 4. She holds it all together, keeps me grounded, and lets me, well… be me. She has never lost faith, no matter how bumpy things got. I can only hope my kids are lucky enough to find someone who supports them like The Boss supports me. Yes, I need my alone time, but without my partners (in business and life) I would be nowhere. Now is the time to remember that. So think about all those folks who allow you to do your thing, and thank them. Especially a week after Thanksgiving – after they thought you forgot. Got to keep them on their toes, after all. -Mike Photo credits: “Thank You Trash…” originally uploaded by Daniel Slaughter Incite 4 U Can we call this a false positive? The major media was buzzing over the short pre-holiday week with reports of a foreign cyber-attack that took down a water pump in Springfield IL. Too bad it didn’t happen – it was an authorized contractor trying to troubleshoot stuff over a connection from Russia (where the guy was traveling on business). What perplexes me is how such a volatile piece of news could get out without corroboration or investigation. Who’s at fault here? The Illinois Statewide Terrorism and Intelligence Center, or the so-called expert who alerted the media? Probably both, but this kind of Chicken Little crap doesn’t help anything. If a water pump goes down, what is the danger? It’s not like the water supply was tampered with. At some point, a cyber-attack will happen. Let’s hope there is more and better information next time – and that it turns out to be as harmless as this incident. – MR No app for that: Good on Chris DiBona for calling anti-virus vendors “charlatans and scammers”. Your average mobile phone user does not know – and does not want to know – the differences between viruses and malware. But developers know the risk vector is not viruses – it’s malicious apps that users willingly install because they don’t know any better. And these bad apps behave like every other app, so it’s not like signature-based detection can help! Of course that does not prevent AV vendors from spewing FUD and selling their wares to the unsuspecting public. It’s refreshing to see a developer sound off without being muzzled by the HR and legal teams, because he is right – AV will not provide any greater protection than what your platform provider offers by yanking malicious apps from their app store. – AL Burn the house down: Before I go any further, I do think the hack these researchers came up with attacking printers is interesting. They figured out that the firmware updates weren’t signed, and were merely sent over as part of a print job. There’s a lot of hyperbole on this one that I will ignore, but printers really are something you should be paying attention to – especially multifunction devices (MFDs). I co-authored a Gartner note about these risks back in the day – among other things they often have insecure web servers built in, keep copies of everything faxed or printed on local hard drives, etc. And a lot of you probably outsource your printer support – like the client who told me their vendor insisted on full VPN access

Share:
Read Post
dinosaur-sidebar

Totally Transparent Research is the embodiment of how we work at Securosis. It’s our core operating philosophy, our research policy, and a specific process. We initially developed it to help maintain objectivity while producing licensed research, but its benefits extend to all aspects of our business.

Going beyond Open Source Research, and a far cry from the traditional syndicated research model, we think it’s the best way to produce independent, objective, quality research.

Here’s how it works:

  • Content is developed ‘live’ on the blog. Primary research is generally released in pieces, as a series of posts, so we can digest and integrate feedback, making the end results much stronger than traditional “ivory tower” research.
  • Comments are enabled for posts. All comments are kept except for spam, personal insults of a clearly inflammatory nature, and completely off-topic content that distracts from the discussion. We welcome comments critical of the work, even if somewhat insulting to the authors. Really.
  • Anyone can comment, and no registration is required. Vendors or consultants with a relevant product or offering must properly identify themselves. While their comments won’t be deleted, the writer/moderator will “call out”, identify, and possibly ridicule vendors who fail to do so.
  • Vendors considering licensing the content are welcome to provide feedback, but it must be posted in the comments - just like everyone else. There is no back channel influence on the research findings or posts.
    Analysts must reply to comments and defend the research position, or agree to modify the content.
  • At the end of the post series, the analyst compiles the posts into a paper, presentation, or other delivery vehicle. Public comments/input factors into the research, where appropriate.
  • If the research is distributed as a paper, significant commenters/contributors are acknowledged in the opening of the report. If they did not post their real names, handles used for comments are listed. Commenters do not retain any rights to the report, but their contributions will be recognized.
  • All primary research will be released under a Creative Commons license. The current license is Non-Commercial, Attribution. The analyst, at their discretion, may add a Derivative Works or Share Alike condition.
  • Securosis primary research does not discuss specific vendors or specific products/offerings, unless used to provide context, contrast or to make a point (which is very very rare).
    Although quotes from published primary research (and published primary research only) may be used in press releases, said quotes may never mention a specific vendor, even if the vendor is mentioned in the source report. Securosis must approve any quote to appear in any vendor marketing collateral.
  • Final primary research will be posted on the blog with open comments.
  • Research will be updated periodically to reflect market realities, based on the discretion of the primary analyst. Updated research will be dated and given a version number.
    For research that cannot be developed using this model, such as complex principles or models that are unsuited for a series of blog posts, the content will be chunked up and posted at or before release of the paper to solicit public feedback, and provide an open venue for comments and criticisms.
  • In rare cases Securosis may write papers outside of the primary research agenda, but only if the end result can be non-biased and valuable to the user community to supplement industry-wide efforts or advances. A “Radically Transparent Research” process will be followed in developing these papers, where absolutely all materials are public at all stages of development, including communications (email, call notes).
    Only the free primary research released on our site can be licensed. We will not accept licensing fees on research we charge users to access.
  • All licensed research will be clearly labeled with the licensees. No licensed research will be released without indicating the sources of licensing fees. Again, there will be no back channel influence. We’re open and transparent about our revenue sources.

In essence, we develop all of our research out in the open, and not only seek public comments, but keep those comments indefinitely as a record of the research creation process. If you believe we are biased or not doing our homework, you can call us out on it and it will be there in the record. Our philosophy involves cracking open the research process, and using our readers to eliminate bias and enhance the quality of the work.

On the back end, here’s how we handle this approach with licensees:

  • Licensees may propose paper topics. The topic may be accepted if it is consistent with the Securosis research agenda and goals, but only if it can be covered without bias and will be valuable to the end user community.
  • Analysts produce research according to their own research agendas, and may offer licensing under the same objectivity requirements.
  • The potential licensee will be provided an outline of our research positions and the potential research product so they can determine if it is likely to meet their objectives.
  • Once the licensee agrees, development of the primary research content begins, following the Totally Transparent Research process as outlined above. At this point, there is no money exchanged.
  • Upon completion of the paper, the licensee will receive a release candidate to determine whether the final result still meets their needs.
  • If the content does not meet their needs, the licensee is not required to pay, and the research will be released without licensing or with alternate licensees.
  • Licensees may host and reuse the content for the length of the license (typically one year). This includes placing the content behind a registration process, posting on white paper networks, or translation into other languages. The research will always be hosted at Securosis for free without registration.

Here is the language we currently place in our research project agreements:

Content will be created independently of LICENSEE with no obligations for payment. Once content is complete, LICENSEE will have a 3 day review period to determine if the content meets corporate objectives. If the content is unsuitable, LICENSEE will not be obligated for any payment and Securosis is free to distribute the whitepaper without branding or with alternate licensees, and will not complete any associated webcasts for the declining LICENSEE. Content licensing, webcasts and payment are contingent on the content being acceptable to LICENSEE. This maintains objectivity while limiting the risk to LICENSEE. Securosis maintains all rights to the content and to include Securosis branding in addition to any licensee branding.

Even this process itself is open to criticism. If you have questions or comments, you can email us or comment on the blog.