Incite 12/14/2011: Family Matters

There are a couple calls you just don’t want to get. Like from the FBI when you’ve had some kind of breach and your secret recipe is listed on eBay. Or from the local cops because your kids did something stupid and you can only hope your umbrella policy will cover it. But those are relatively trivial in the grand scheme of things. I got a call Friday morning that my Uncle Mac had passed away suddenly. I can’t say we were very close, but he met my aunt when I was a kid, and has been present at good times and bad over the past 35 years. Mac was a bear of a guy. Big and loud (okay, maybe it’s a family trait), but with a heart of gold and a liver of steel, given the crappy vodka he drank. He had the cleaning contract at West Point stadium for football games, so I grew up with a gas powered blower on my back, cleaning up football messes many Saturdays of my youth. He worked hard and got along with folks from all walks of life. He passed doing what he did most mornings, sitting in his big chair drinking his morning coffee. He made a peaceful transition to the next thing, and for that we’re all grateful. So my brother and I woke early on Sunday to travel to NY for the memorial service. A whole bunch of my family was there. Obviously my first cousins were there – Mac was their father figure. Most of my Dad’s first cousins (and he has a lot) represented, and a few of their kids showed as well. Even our own family Urkel showed up. Yes, you know every family has one and mine is no exception. It was great to see everyone (even Urkel), although it seems we only get together when something bad has happened. Soon enough there will be weddings and the like to celebrate and I look forward to convening on happier occasions. We even threatened to organize a family reunion. The logistics of pulling that off would be monumental, with family members spread across the country, but it’s worth trying. It reminded me that family matters, and as busy as life gets I shouldn’t forget that. Yet there are also family matters that a sudden death presents. Matters all too easy to sweep under the rug. You know, those economic discussions that rival a root canal. My aunt had little visibility into my uncle’s business dealings, and now she’s got to both find and figure out what needs to happen to wrap his business up. He also handled much of the bill paying. Now she has to figure out who is owed what and when. Your lawyer probably talks about estate planning (if you have an estate to plan) and tells you to make sure your stuff is properly documented, but this is a clear reminder that I have work to do. As much as you want to plan, you never know when your time is up. It’s hard enough for the survivors to deal with the emptiness and grief of the loss, especially a sudden loss. To add financial uncertainty due to poor documentation seems kind of ridiculous. Obviously no one wants to think or talk about their own mortality, but it’s not a bad idea to document the important stuff and let the folks know where to find what they need, and show your care for them. And remember to spend time remembering your lost family member. Tell stories about what a good person they were and funny stories about their quirks and crazy habits. Tell stories of their mistakes – no one is perfect. But most of all appreciate someone’s life in its entirety. The good, the bad, and the ugly. Then hold onto the good and let all the other stuff go. That’s what we did, and it was a great and fitting farewell to my Uncle Mac. -Mike Photo credits: “s. urkel jerk by alex pardee” originally uploaded by N0 Photoshop Incite 4 U Research timelines measured in decades, not zero days: In an instant gratification world, no one gets more instant gratification than computer attackers. Send phish, create botnet, do bad things quickly. Government can and should drive initiatives to address this gap, and help supplement private sector and university efforts. In the US those efforts are moving, as evidenced by the recent road map of cyber-security (that term still makes me throw up in my mouth a little) research priorities, as issued by the Office of Science and Technology Policy. But most security folks will ultimately be disappointed by any research efforts in our space. Why? Because we think in terms of zero days and reacting faster. Basic research doesn’t work like that. Those timelines are years, sometimes decades. Keep that in mind when assessing the success of any kind of basic research. – MR Worry when, on Android? Tom’s Hardware says Android Security: Worry, But Don’t Panic, Yet. So if not now, when? Google is in an apps arms race: They’re not slowing down to vet applications so we see a lot of malicious stuff. We know that anti-virus and anti-malware doesn’t work on mobile platforms. We’re not going to ride the same virus/patch merry-go-round we did with PCs – that’s clearly a failed security model. But so far we’re not doing much better – instead we have a “find malware/remove app” model. The only improvement is that users don’t pay for security bandaids. If Android does not fix security – both OS issues and app vetting – we’ll have Windows PC security all over again. But this will be on a much broader scale – there are far more mobile devices. The speed at which we install apps and share data means faster time to damage. So perhaps don’t worry today – but as a consumer you should be worried about using these devices for mobile payments,

Read Post

Totally Transparent Research is the embodiment of how we work at Securosis. It’s our core operating philosophy, our research policy, and a specific process. We initially developed it to help maintain objectivity while producing licensed research, but its benefits extend to all aspects of our business.

Going beyond Open Source Research, and a far cry from the traditional syndicated research model, we think it’s the best way to produce independent, objective, quality research.

Here’s how it works:

  • Content is developed ‘live’ on the blog. Primary research is generally released in pieces, as a series of posts, so we can digest and integrate feedback, making the end results much stronger than traditional “ivory tower” research.
  • Comments are enabled for posts. All comments are kept except for spam, personal insults of a clearly inflammatory nature, and completely off-topic content that distracts from the discussion. We welcome comments critical of the work, even if somewhat insulting to the authors. Really.
  • Anyone can comment, and no registration is required. Vendors or consultants with a relevant product or offering must properly identify themselves. While their comments won’t be deleted, the writer/moderator will “call out”, identify, and possibly ridicule vendors who fail to do so.
  • Vendors considering licensing the content are welcome to provide feedback, but it must be posted in the comments - just like everyone else. There is no back channel influence on the research findings or posts.
    Analysts must reply to comments and defend the research position, or agree to modify the content.
  • At the end of the post series, the analyst compiles the posts into a paper, presentation, or other delivery vehicle. Public comments/input factors into the research, where appropriate.
  • If the research is distributed as a paper, significant commenters/contributors are acknowledged in the opening of the report. If they did not post their real names, handles used for comments are listed. Commenters do not retain any rights to the report, but their contributions will be recognized.
  • All primary research will be released under a Creative Commons license. The current license is Non-Commercial, Attribution. The analyst, at their discretion, may add a Derivative Works or Share Alike condition.
  • Securosis primary research does not discuss specific vendors or specific products/offerings, unless used to provide context, contrast or to make a point (which is very very rare).
    Although quotes from published primary research (and published primary research only) may be used in press releases, said quotes may never mention a specific vendor, even if the vendor is mentioned in the source report. Securosis must approve any quote to appear in any vendor marketing collateral.
  • Final primary research will be posted on the blog with open comments.
  • Research will be updated periodically to reflect market realities, based on the discretion of the primary analyst. Updated research will be dated and given a version number.
    For research that cannot be developed using this model, such as complex principles or models that are unsuited for a series of blog posts, the content will be chunked up and posted at or before release of the paper to solicit public feedback, and provide an open venue for comments and criticisms.
  • In rare cases Securosis may write papers outside of the primary research agenda, but only if the end result can be non-biased and valuable to the user community to supplement industry-wide efforts or advances. A “Radically Transparent Research” process will be followed in developing these papers, where absolutely all materials are public at all stages of development, including communications (email, call notes).
    Only the free primary research released on our site can be licensed. We will not accept licensing fees on research we charge users to access.
  • All licensed research will be clearly labeled with the licensees. No licensed research will be released without indicating the sources of licensing fees. Again, there will be no back channel influence. We’re open and transparent about our revenue sources.

In essence, we develop all of our research out in the open, and not only seek public comments, but keep those comments indefinitely as a record of the research creation process. If you believe we are biased or not doing our homework, you can call us out on it and it will be there in the record. Our philosophy involves cracking open the research process, and using our readers to eliminate bias and enhance the quality of the work.

On the back end, here’s how we handle this approach with licensees:

  • Licensees may propose paper topics. The topic may be accepted if it is consistent with the Securosis research agenda and goals, but only if it can be covered without bias and will be valuable to the end user community.
  • Analysts produce research according to their own research agendas, and may offer licensing under the same objectivity requirements.
  • The potential licensee will be provided an outline of our research positions and the potential research product so they can determine if it is likely to meet their objectives.
  • Once the licensee agrees, development of the primary research content begins, following the Totally Transparent Research process as outlined above. At this point, there is no money exchanged.
  • Upon completion of the paper, the licensee will receive a release candidate to determine whether the final result still meets their needs.
  • If the content does not meet their needs, the licensee is not required to pay, and the research will be released without licensing or with alternate licensees.
  • Licensees may host and reuse the content for the length of the license (typically one year). This includes placing the content behind a registration process, posting on white paper networks, or translation into other languages. The research will always be hosted at Securosis for free without registration.

Here is the language we currently place in our research project agreements:

Content will be created independently of LICENSEE with no obligations for payment. Once content is complete, LICENSEE will have a 3 day review period to determine if the content meets corporate objectives. If the content is unsuitable, LICENSEE will not be obligated for any payment and Securosis is free to distribute the whitepaper without branding or with alternate licensees, and will not complete any associated webcasts for the declining LICENSEE. Content licensing, webcasts and payment are contingent on the content being acceptable to LICENSEE. This maintains objectivity while limiting the risk to LICENSEE. Securosis maintains all rights to the content and to include Securosis branding in addition to any licensee branding.

Even this process itself is open to criticism. If you have questions or comments, you can email us or comment on the blog.