Securosis

Research

Incite 10/9/2013: Youth is wasted on the young

A couple years ago, when I decided to lose weight and change my eating habits, I did it with a view to living until I was at least 90. That was the number I envisioned, and given my family history, it should be achievable. So as I celebrated my 45th birthday this week, it was strange to realize that I’m close to halfway done. WTF? How did that happen? It seems just like yesterday I was loading up the U-Haul for the trek to relocate to DC after college to start my adult life. That yesterday was 24 years ago. I drove that speed limited truck (it wouldn’t go faster than 60) with all my worldly possessions down the 95 with all these expectations. I was going to do this, and do that, and achieve this, and basically become the master of all I survey. No plan survives contact with the enemy, and mine was no exception. I certainly had the energy and the drive, but I didn’t understand the game. I was too young to have any perspective. All I wanted to be was an adult, and have my own money and buy my own stuff and be responsible for myself. It took 24+ years of screwing things up to finally appreciate how the old saying: “Youth is wasted on the young” is absolutely correct. The young don’t know how to harness their capabilities. They don’t know what they don’t know. Which is obvious every time I chat with kids just entering the job markets. I love their energy and idealism, but I shake my head at their sense of entitlement. Mostly I’m excited for them to learn stuff the way I learned it – the hard way. That’s really the only way to learn, and these kids will do great things in the few instances when they aren’t screwing up. But 24+ years later, I can appreciate that process and understand that I had to go through the good, the bad, and the ugly to end up where I am today. Which is right where I should be. So as I enter the second half of my life, I am thankful for the first half. It gave me an opportunity to figure some things out, especially about myself and what’s important to me. I don’t worry so much any more about fitting in or living up to others’ expectations. I’m young enough to still do a lot of stuff, but old enough to kind of know what I’m doing. And that’s a good place to be. –Mike Photo credit: Youth on the Move in Volos 12, originally uploaded by EU Social Heavy Research We are back at work on a variety of blog series, so here is a list of the research currently underway. Remember you can get our Heavy Feed via RSS, where you can get all our content in its unabridged glory. And you can get all our research papers too. Defending Against Application Denial of Service Introduction Firewall Management Essentials Quick Wins Managing Access Risk Optimizing Rules Change Management Introduction Newly Published Papers Continuous Security Monitoring API Gateways Threat Intelligence for Ecosystem Risk Management Dealing with Database Denial of Service Identity and Access Management for Cloud Services The 2014 Endpoint Security Buyer’s Guide The CISO’s Guide to Advanced Attackers Incite 4 U Keep it simple, get it right: I am often highly critical of Poneman Institute reports because their methodology is often flawed, especially using surveys to estimate losses for intellectual assets that can’t really be quantified. But their latest Cost of Cybercrime report moves in the right direction. This time it only counts direct costs related to incident response, not some wild-ass guess at the value of stolen files. I do believe these costs can be quantified, although the odds are many organizations lack the maturity and tracking to really be consistent about what it really costs to clean up a mess. But Ponemon kept a tight scope, with clear definitions, and noted that costs rose 18% (total, not per incident). One reason cited may be the increasing numbers and sophistication of attacks, but I suspect better detection incidents is a larger factor. – RM Down the river of payments: The card brands very publicly announced a global tokenization proposal to make shopping “simpler and safer”, which they promise to release real soon now. But, with significantly less press coverage, on-line retailer Amazon went one step better – by extending Amazon’s existing payment infrastructure to other retail sites. Amazon customers will leverage their Amazon account, including payment and shipping preferences, when they buy from participating retailers. That is Payment as a Service (PAYaaS), people! Participating merchants will no longer need to manage and secure the payment process, or user accounts and passwords, so they will not need to slog through PCI requirements. Amazon makes money on each transaction. Users benefit from a single account and password, and only need to trust Amazon (who already provides a very good user experience) with their account & payment information. – AL 3 Keys to security survival: Great overview in Dark Reading of how the core imperatives of a CISO continue to change given the Inevitability of Attacks. The article covers an Interop presentation by Blackstone’s CISO, Jay Leek, and describes three mindset and strategic shifts. The first is to get better visibility into threats and attacks. You also need better intelligence about attacks and attackers. And finally you need a planned response rather than just reacting to the latest attack du jour. It is right on the money so check out the article when you can. And keep in mind that this doesn’t mean you need to dump all your preventative controls. It just means you need to do a better job of being prepared to respond. – MR Assume the worst: We have been saying for years that you should assume your environment has been breached, or will be, and define your defensive controls around that.

Share:
Read Post
dinosaur-sidebar

Totally Transparent Research is the embodiment of how we work at Securosis. It’s our core operating philosophy, our research policy, and a specific process. We initially developed it to help maintain objectivity while producing licensed research, but its benefits extend to all aspects of our business.

Going beyond Open Source Research, and a far cry from the traditional syndicated research model, we think it’s the best way to produce independent, objective, quality research.

Here’s how it works:

  • Content is developed ‘live’ on the blog. Primary research is generally released in pieces, as a series of posts, so we can digest and integrate feedback, making the end results much stronger than traditional “ivory tower” research.
  • Comments are enabled for posts. All comments are kept except for spam, personal insults of a clearly inflammatory nature, and completely off-topic content that distracts from the discussion. We welcome comments critical of the work, even if somewhat insulting to the authors. Really.
  • Anyone can comment, and no registration is required. Vendors or consultants with a relevant product or offering must properly identify themselves. While their comments won’t be deleted, the writer/moderator will “call out”, identify, and possibly ridicule vendors who fail to do so.
  • Vendors considering licensing the content are welcome to provide feedback, but it must be posted in the comments - just like everyone else. There is no back channel influence on the research findings or posts.
    Analysts must reply to comments and defend the research position, or agree to modify the content.
  • At the end of the post series, the analyst compiles the posts into a paper, presentation, or other delivery vehicle. Public comments/input factors into the research, where appropriate.
  • If the research is distributed as a paper, significant commenters/contributors are acknowledged in the opening of the report. If they did not post their real names, handles used for comments are listed. Commenters do not retain any rights to the report, but their contributions will be recognized.
  • All primary research will be released under a Creative Commons license. The current license is Non-Commercial, Attribution. The analyst, at their discretion, may add a Derivative Works or Share Alike condition.
  • Securosis primary research does not discuss specific vendors or specific products/offerings, unless used to provide context, contrast or to make a point (which is very very rare).
    Although quotes from published primary research (and published primary research only) may be used in press releases, said quotes may never mention a specific vendor, even if the vendor is mentioned in the source report. Securosis must approve any quote to appear in any vendor marketing collateral.
  • Final primary research will be posted on the blog with open comments.
  • Research will be updated periodically to reflect market realities, based on the discretion of the primary analyst. Updated research will be dated and given a version number.
    For research that cannot be developed using this model, such as complex principles or models that are unsuited for a series of blog posts, the content will be chunked up and posted at or before release of the paper to solicit public feedback, and provide an open venue for comments and criticisms.
  • In rare cases Securosis may write papers outside of the primary research agenda, but only if the end result can be non-biased and valuable to the user community to supplement industry-wide efforts or advances. A “Radically Transparent Research” process will be followed in developing these papers, where absolutely all materials are public at all stages of development, including communications (email, call notes).
    Only the free primary research released on our site can be licensed. We will not accept licensing fees on research we charge users to access.
  • All licensed research will be clearly labeled with the licensees. No licensed research will be released without indicating the sources of licensing fees. Again, there will be no back channel influence. We’re open and transparent about our revenue sources.

In essence, we develop all of our research out in the open, and not only seek public comments, but keep those comments indefinitely as a record of the research creation process. If you believe we are biased or not doing our homework, you can call us out on it and it will be there in the record. Our philosophy involves cracking open the research process, and using our readers to eliminate bias and enhance the quality of the work.

On the back end, here’s how we handle this approach with licensees:

  • Licensees may propose paper topics. The topic may be accepted if it is consistent with the Securosis research agenda and goals, but only if it can be covered without bias and will be valuable to the end user community.
  • Analysts produce research according to their own research agendas, and may offer licensing under the same objectivity requirements.
  • The potential licensee will be provided an outline of our research positions and the potential research product so they can determine if it is likely to meet their objectives.
  • Once the licensee agrees, development of the primary research content begins, following the Totally Transparent Research process as outlined above. At this point, there is no money exchanged.
  • Upon completion of the paper, the licensee will receive a release candidate to determine whether the final result still meets their needs.
  • If the content does not meet their needs, the licensee is not required to pay, and the research will be released without licensing or with alternate licensees.
  • Licensees may host and reuse the content for the length of the license (typically one year). This includes placing the content behind a registration process, posting on white paper networks, or translation into other languages. The research will always be hosted at Securosis for free without registration.

Here is the language we currently place in our research project agreements:

Content will be created independently of LICENSEE with no obligations for payment. Once content is complete, LICENSEE will have a 3 day review period to determine if the content meets corporate objectives. If the content is unsuitable, LICENSEE will not be obligated for any payment and Securosis is free to distribute the whitepaper without branding or with alternate licensees, and will not complete any associated webcasts for the declining LICENSEE. Content licensing, webcasts and payment are contingent on the content being acceptable to LICENSEE. This maintains objectivity while limiting the risk to LICENSEE. Securosis maintains all rights to the content and to include Securosis branding in addition to any licensee branding.

Even this process itself is open to criticism. If you have questions or comments, you can email us or comment on the blog.