Securosis

Menu

Research

Incite 5/14/2014: Solo Exploration

Mike Rothman May 14, 2014 No Comments

Is it possible to like interacting with people, yet need time alone? To really enjoy working in a team, yet cherish a night of solitude? I have always defined myself as an introvert. It provided a convenient excuse when I just didn’t want to deal with people. Though I do need my solo time to recharge, that’s for sure. But I also need to be social. Not all the time and not for extended periods of time, but a life of solitude doesn’t really appeal to me either. It’s an interesting contrast. I am on the road this week. Again. I’m not going to complain because I really enjoy working with clients, attending conferences, and seeing friends. It also means I’m busy, which is key in a small shop. But Monday night I didn’t want to mingle. In a conference situation I’m always on. It’s exhausting. By the end of the day Monday I was done. Normally I’d just get room service and stare at my computer, pretending to be ‘productive’. But Monday night the idea of another night in a nondescript hotel room wasn’t interesting. I needed to do something, but there were no major sports in town. And the local ballet and shows were dark since it was Monday night. Thankfully a quick search of the Google showed me the answer. It was time for some solo exploration. I found a show staged by a local theater company, only a short cab ride away. So I went to see it – by myself. I didn’t have a ticket. I didn’t take a map. I was in Canada, and being a cheap ass I didn’t even have Internet service on my phone. So no ability to have my magic device tell me things. I didn’t care. I was exploring. Not like Edmund Hillary or anything. But like a middle aged business guy in a city. The show was great. The experience was great. It was about how the decisions we make influenced by our fears and perceptions can get us in trouble. But it had a good ending and a better message about kindness and perseverance. Better yet, I got my time to recharge. I woke up Tuesday morning ready to go. Not long ago I would have been content to just sit in my room and maybe watch some sports. No longer. If I’m going to travel I may as well explore a bit. It’s a big world – I’m going to check it out. One city at a time. –Mike Photo credit: “Solo” originally uploaded by Ruth Flickr Securosis Firestarter Have you checked out our new video podcast? Rich, Adrian, and Mike get into a Google Hangout and.. hang out. We talk a bit about security as well. We try to keep these to 15 minutes or less, and usually fail. May 12 – Another 3 for 5: McAfee/OSVDB, XP Not Dead, CEO head rolling May 5 – There Is No SecDevOps April 28 – The Verizon DBIR April 14 – Three for Five March 24 – The End of Full Disclosure March 19 – An Irish Wake March 11 – RSA Postmortem Feb 21 – Happy Hour – RSA 2014 Feb 17 – Payment Madness Feb 10 – Mass Media Abuse 2014 RSA Conference Guide In case any of you missed it, we published our fifth RSA Conference Guide back in February. Yes, we do mention the conference a bit, but it’s really our ideas about how security will shake out in 2014. You can get the full guide with all the memes you can eat. Heavy Research We are back at work on a variety of blog series, so here is a list of the research currently underway. Remember you can get our Heavy Feed via RSS, with our content in all its unabridged glory. And you can get all our research papers too. Understanding Role-based Access Control Advanced Concepts Introduction NoSQL Security 2.0 Understanding NoSQL Platforms Introduction Newly Published Papers Advanced Endpoint and Server Protection Defending Against Network-based DDoS Attacks Reducing Attack Surface with Application Control Leveraging Threat Intelligence in Security Monitoring The Future of Security Security Management 2.5: Replacing Your SIEM Yet? Defending Data on iOS 7 Eliminating Surprises with Security Assurance and Testing Incite 4 U Rich and Adrian are traveling this week, so no Incite from them. I do not judge. Though I point out that I’m on the road as well… First they’ll come for AV… Wendy makes a great point about how all these new-fangled advanced and next-generation security technologies don’t claim to replace the existing stuff. At least not on endpoints. Why? I am stumped, and I have been advising all these advanced endpoint folks to bundle in an AV engine to take that issue off the table. Why position a complimentary product, forcing customers to buy and run the old AV stuff as well, when they could go for the whole enchilada? Oh, it’s scary. Customers have inertia. Assessors may squeal like stuck pigs. But here’s the dirty little secret. Customers want to buy one solution. They want simplicity. They want bundling. Most of all they want something that works. I agree that bundling will continue among security products, and the traditional endpoint protection product will be first on the extinction list. – MR Time is your enemy: I didn’t mention anything specifically related to Mandiant/FireEye’s M-Trends report when it hit back in mid-April, but I should have. It is another great report providing useful perspective on attack trends. Richard Bejtlich does all of us a favor and highlights a key finding: time. His point, in referring to the Syrian Electronic Army’s attack on a media company, is that within a day an adversary will update malware to make it even harder to find. So once a device has been compromised the clock starts to tick. The good news is that Mandiant saw a general decrease in dwell time in 2013 (compared to 2012), but a decrease in the percentage of attacks discovered by the victim. Two steps forward, one step back – while we’re playing beat the clock. Progress

Share:
Read Post
dinosaur-sidebar

Research

view all

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Totally Transparent Research is the embodiment of how we work at Securosis. It’s our core operating philosophy, our research policy, and a specific process. We initially developed it to help maintain objectivity while producing licensed research, but its benefits extend to all aspects of our business.

Going beyond Open Source Research, and a far cry from the traditional syndicated research model, we think it’s the best way to produce independent, objective, quality research.

Here’s how it works:

  • Content is developed ‘live’ on the blog. Primary research is generally released in pieces, as a series of posts, so we can digest and integrate feedback, making the end results much stronger than traditional “ivory tower” research.
  • Comments are enabled for posts. All comments are kept except for spam, personal insults of a clearly inflammatory nature, and completely off-topic content that distracts from the discussion. We welcome comments critical of the work, even if somewhat insulting to the authors. Really.
  • Anyone can comment, and no registration is required. Vendors or consultants with a relevant product or offering must properly identify themselves. While their comments won’t be deleted, the writer/moderator will “call out”, identify, and possibly ridicule vendors who fail to do so.
  • Vendors considering licensing the content are welcome to provide feedback, but it must be posted in the comments - just like everyone else. There is no back channel influence on the research findings or posts.
    Analysts must reply to comments and defend the research position, or agree to modify the content.
  • At the end of the post series, the analyst compiles the posts into a paper, presentation, or other delivery vehicle. Public comments/input factors into the research, where appropriate.
  • If the research is distributed as a paper, significant commenters/contributors are acknowledged in the opening of the report. If they did not post their real names, handles used for comments are listed. Commenters do not retain any rights to the report, but their contributions will be recognized.
  • All primary research will be released under a Creative Commons license. The current license is Non-Commercial, Attribution. The analyst, at their discretion, may add a Derivative Works or Share Alike condition.
  • Securosis primary research does not discuss specific vendors or specific products/offerings, unless used to provide context, contrast or to make a point (which is very very rare).
    Although quotes from published primary research (and published primary research only) may be used in press releases, said quotes may never mention a specific vendor, even if the vendor is mentioned in the source report. Securosis must approve any quote to appear in any vendor marketing collateral.
  • Final primary research will be posted on the blog with open comments.
  • Research will be updated periodically to reflect market realities, based on the discretion of the primary analyst. Updated research will be dated and given a version number.
    For research that cannot be developed using this model, such as complex principles or models that are unsuited for a series of blog posts, the content will be chunked up and posted at or before release of the paper to solicit public feedback, and provide an open venue for comments and criticisms.
  • In rare cases Securosis may write papers outside of the primary research agenda, but only if the end result can be non-biased and valuable to the user community to supplement industry-wide efforts or advances. A “Radically Transparent Research” process will be followed in developing these papers, where absolutely all materials are public at all stages of development, including communications (email, call notes).
    Only the free primary research released on our site can be licensed. We will not accept licensing fees on research we charge users to access.
  • All licensed research will be clearly labeled with the licensees. No licensed research will be released without indicating the sources of licensing fees. Again, there will be no back channel influence. We’re open and transparent about our revenue sources.

In essence, we develop all of our research out in the open, and not only seek public comments, but keep those comments indefinitely as a record of the research creation process. If you believe we are biased or not doing our homework, you can call us out on it and it will be there in the record. Our philosophy involves cracking open the research process, and using our readers to eliminate bias and enhance the quality of the work.

On the back end, here’s how we handle this approach with licensees:

  • Licensees may propose paper topics. The topic may be accepted if it is consistent with the Securosis research agenda and goals, but only if it can be covered without bias and will be valuable to the end user community.
  • Analysts produce research according to their own research agendas, and may offer licensing under the same objectivity requirements.
  • The potential licensee will be provided an outline of our research positions and the potential research product so they can determine if it is likely to meet their objectives.
  • Once the licensee agrees, development of the primary research content begins, following the Totally Transparent Research process as outlined above. At this point, there is no money exchanged.
  • Upon completion of the paper, the licensee will receive a release candidate to determine whether the final result still meets their needs.
  • If the content does not meet their needs, the licensee is not required to pay, and the research will be released without licensing or with alternate licensees.
  • Licensees may host and reuse the content for the length of the license (typically one year). This includes placing the content behind a registration process, posting on white paper networks, or translation into other languages. The research will always be hosted at Securosis for free without registration.

Here is the language we currently place in our research project agreements:

“Content will be created independently of LICENSEE with no obligations for payment. Once content is complete, LICENSEE will have a 3 day review period to determine if the content meets corporate objectives. If the content is unsuitable, LICENSEE will not be obligated for any payment and Securosis is free to distribute the whitepaper without branding or with alternate licensees, and will not complete any associated webcasts for the declining LICENSEE. Content licensing, webcasts and payment are contingent on the content being acceptable to LICENSEE. This maintains objectivity while limiting the risk to LICENSEE. Securosis maintains all rights to the content and to include Securosis branding in addition to any licensee branding.”

Even this process itself is open to criticism. If you have questions or comments, you can email us or comment on the blog.