Securosis

Menu

Research

Incite 6/25/2014: June Daze

Mike Rothman June 25, 2014 No Comments

I’m not sure why I ever think I’ll get anything done in June. I do try. I convince myself this year will be different. I look at the calendar and figure I’ll be able to squeeze in some writing. I’m always optimistic that I will be able to crank through it because there is stuff to get done. And then at the end of June I just shrug and say to myself, “Yup, another June gone and not much got done.” That’s not really true. I did a lot of travel. I took some great vacations with the family. I had great meetings with clients. But from a deliverables standpoint, not much got done at all. I shouldn’t be hard on myself because I have been at home a grand total of 30 hours for the entire month thus far. Seriously, 30 hours. Yes, I understand these are first world problems. I mentioned that the girls dance at Disney, then it was off to the west coast for a client meeting. Then I flew across the pond for a couple days in London for the Eskenzi PR CISO forum. For the first time (shocking!), I got to tour around London and it was great. What a cool city! Duh. As I mentioned in Solo Exploration I’ve made a point to explore cities I visit when possible, and equipped with my trusty mini-backpack I set out to see London. And I did. I saw shows. I checked out the sites with the rest of the tourists. I took selfies (since evidently that’s what all the kids do today). I met up with some friends of friends (non-work related) and former colleagues who I don’t get to see enough. It was great. But right when I got home, it was a frantic couple hours of packing to get ready for the annual beach trip with my in-laws. Yup, told you this was a first world problem. I did work a bit at the beach, but that was mostly to make sure I didn’t drown when I resurfaced today. I also had some calls to do since I wasn’t able to do them earlier in the month, and given that I commit to family time by noon, there wasn’t a lot of time to write. There never is in June. Then last Sunday we dropped the kids off for their 6+ weeks of camp and I spent another couple days meeting friends and clients in DC around a certain other analyst firm’s annual security conference. So by the time we packed up the van and headed back to ATL yesterday, I have basically been gone the entire month. Now I have a few days in ATL to dig out and then it’s another quick trip next week. Yes, this is the life I chose. Yes, I really enjoy the work. And yes, I’m in a daze and it won’t slow down until the middle of July. Then I’ll get to bang through the backlog and start work on summer projects. I could make myself crazy about what’s not getting done, or I can take a step back and remember things are great. I choose the latter, so I’ll get done what I can and smile about it. I will be sure to be a bit more realistic about what will get done next June. Until I’m not. –Mike Photo credit: “Daze” originally uploaded by Clifford Horn The fine folks at the RSA Conference posted the talk Jennifer Minella and I gave on mindfulness at the conference this year. You can check it out on YouTube. Take an hour and check it out. Your emails, alerts, and Twitter timeline will be there when you get back. Securosis Firestarter Have you checked out our new video podcast? Rich, Adrian, and Mike get into a Google Hangout and.. hang out. We talk a bit about security as well. We try to keep these to 15 minutes or less, and usually fail. June 17 – Apple and Privacy May 19 – Wanted Posters and SleepyCon May 12 – Another 3 for 5: McAfee/OSVDB, XP Not Dead, CEO head rolling May 5 – There Is No SecDevOps April 28 – The Verizon DBIR April 14 – Three for Five March 24 – The End of Full Disclosure March 19 – An Irish Wake March 11 – RSA Postmortem Feb 21 – Happy Hour – RSA 2014 Heavy Research We are back at work on a variety of blog series, so here is a list of the research currently underway. Remember you can get our Heavy Feed via RSS, with our content in all its unabridged glory. And you can get all our research papers too. Trends in Data Centric Security Introduction Open Source Development and Application Security Analysis Development Trends Application Security Introduction Understanding Role-based Access Control Advanced Concepts Introduction NoSQL Security 2.0 Understanding NoSQL Platforms Introduction Newly Published Papers Advanced Endpoint and Server Protection Defending Against Network-based DDoS Attacks Reducing Attack Surface with Application Control Leveraging Threat Intelligence in Security Monitoring The Future of Security Security Management 2.5: Replacing Your SIEM Yet? Defending Data on iOS 7 Eliminating Surprises with Security Assurance and Testing Incite 4 U Problem fixed. Now clean up your mess. Yes, some 300k sites have yet to patch the OpenSSL ‘Heartbleed’ vulnerability, but a more troubling issue is that residual leaked data will cause ongoing problems, as Robert Hansen illustrated in The Ghost of Information Disclosure Past. Many vulnerable sites had credentials scraped, and while they asked their users to reset their passwords, they did not force resets. Attackers now have accumulated credentials which can provide fun and mayhem for anyone with 5 Bitcoins. The Heartbleed cleanup is messy, and in cases where (potentially) all user passwords could be compromised, it is best to “nuke from orbit” and require resets for all registered users. No one said it was easy, right? – AL You too can be a security person: There is no doubting the skills shortage in security. We routinely talk to folks who have open positions for 6-12 months and they are significantly compromising on the skills & capabilities of candidates.

Share:
Read Post
dinosaur-sidebar

Research

view all

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Totally Transparent Research is the embodiment of how we work at Securosis. It’s our core operating philosophy, our research policy, and a specific process. We initially developed it to help maintain objectivity while producing licensed research, but its benefits extend to all aspects of our business.

Going beyond Open Source Research, and a far cry from the traditional syndicated research model, we think it’s the best way to produce independent, objective, quality research.

Here’s how it works:

  • Content is developed ‘live’ on the blog. Primary research is generally released in pieces, as a series of posts, so we can digest and integrate feedback, making the end results much stronger than traditional “ivory tower” research.
  • Comments are enabled for posts. All comments are kept except for spam, personal insults of a clearly inflammatory nature, and completely off-topic content that distracts from the discussion. We welcome comments critical of the work, even if somewhat insulting to the authors. Really.
  • Anyone can comment, and no registration is required. Vendors or consultants with a relevant product or offering must properly identify themselves. While their comments won’t be deleted, the writer/moderator will “call out”, identify, and possibly ridicule vendors who fail to do so.
  • Vendors considering licensing the content are welcome to provide feedback, but it must be posted in the comments - just like everyone else. There is no back channel influence on the research findings or posts.
    Analysts must reply to comments and defend the research position, or agree to modify the content.
  • At the end of the post series, the analyst compiles the posts into a paper, presentation, or other delivery vehicle. Public comments/input factors into the research, where appropriate.
  • If the research is distributed as a paper, significant commenters/contributors are acknowledged in the opening of the report. If they did not post their real names, handles used for comments are listed. Commenters do not retain any rights to the report, but their contributions will be recognized.
  • All primary research will be released under a Creative Commons license. The current license is Non-Commercial, Attribution. The analyst, at their discretion, may add a Derivative Works or Share Alike condition.
  • Securosis primary research does not discuss specific vendors or specific products/offerings, unless used to provide context, contrast or to make a point (which is very very rare).
    Although quotes from published primary research (and published primary research only) may be used in press releases, said quotes may never mention a specific vendor, even if the vendor is mentioned in the source report. Securosis must approve any quote to appear in any vendor marketing collateral.
  • Final primary research will be posted on the blog with open comments.
  • Research will be updated periodically to reflect market realities, based on the discretion of the primary analyst. Updated research will be dated and given a version number.
    For research that cannot be developed using this model, such as complex principles or models that are unsuited for a series of blog posts, the content will be chunked up and posted at or before release of the paper to solicit public feedback, and provide an open venue for comments and criticisms.
  • In rare cases Securosis may write papers outside of the primary research agenda, but only if the end result can be non-biased and valuable to the user community to supplement industry-wide efforts or advances. A “Radically Transparent Research” process will be followed in developing these papers, where absolutely all materials are public at all stages of development, including communications (email, call notes).
    Only the free primary research released on our site can be licensed. We will not accept licensing fees on research we charge users to access.
  • All licensed research will be clearly labeled with the licensees. No licensed research will be released without indicating the sources of licensing fees. Again, there will be no back channel influence. We’re open and transparent about our revenue sources.

In essence, we develop all of our research out in the open, and not only seek public comments, but keep those comments indefinitely as a record of the research creation process. If you believe we are biased or not doing our homework, you can call us out on it and it will be there in the record. Our philosophy involves cracking open the research process, and using our readers to eliminate bias and enhance the quality of the work.

On the back end, here’s how we handle this approach with licensees:

  • Licensees may propose paper topics. The topic may be accepted if it is consistent with the Securosis research agenda and goals, but only if it can be covered without bias and will be valuable to the end user community.
  • Analysts produce research according to their own research agendas, and may offer licensing under the same objectivity requirements.
  • The potential licensee will be provided an outline of our research positions and the potential research product so they can determine if it is likely to meet their objectives.
  • Once the licensee agrees, development of the primary research content begins, following the Totally Transparent Research process as outlined above. At this point, there is no money exchanged.
  • Upon completion of the paper, the licensee will receive a release candidate to determine whether the final result still meets their needs.
  • If the content does not meet their needs, the licensee is not required to pay, and the research will be released without licensing or with alternate licensees.
  • Licensees may host and reuse the content for the length of the license (typically one year). This includes placing the content behind a registration process, posting on white paper networks, or translation into other languages. The research will always be hosted at Securosis for free without registration.

Here is the language we currently place in our research project agreements:

“Content will be created independently of LICENSEE with no obligations for payment. Once content is complete, LICENSEE will have a 3 day review period to determine if the content meets corporate objectives. If the content is unsuitable, LICENSEE will not be obligated for any payment and Securosis is free to distribute the whitepaper without branding or with alternate licensees, and will not complete any associated webcasts for the declining LICENSEE. Content licensing, webcasts and payment are contingent on the content being acceptable to LICENSEE. This maintains objectivity while limiting the risk to LICENSEE. Securosis maintains all rights to the content and to include Securosis branding in addition to any licensee branding.”

Even this process itself is open to criticism. If you have questions or comments, you can email us or comment on the blog.