Securosis

Research

Securing SAP Clouds: Application Security

This post will discuss the foundational elements of an application security program for SAP HCP deployments. Without direct responsibility for management of hardware and physical networks you lose the traditional security data capture points for traffic analysis and firewall technologies. The net result is that, whether on PaaS or IaaS, your application security program becomes more important than ever as what you have control over. Yes, SAP provides some network monitoring and DDoS services, but your options are are limited, they don’t share much data, and what they monitor is not tailored to your applications or requirements. Any application security program requires a breadth of security services: to protect data in motion and at rest, to ensure users are authenticated and can only view data they have rights to, to ensure the application platform is properly patched and configured, and to make sure an audit trail is generated. The relevant areas to apply these controls to are the Hana in-memory platform, SAP add-on modules, your custom application code, data storage, and supplementary services such as identity management and the management dashboard. All these areas are at or above the “water line” we defined earlier. This presents a fairly large matrix of issues to address. SAP provides many of the core security features you need, but their model is largely based on identity management and access control capabilities built into the service. The following are the core features of SAP HCP: Identity Management: The SAP HANA Cloud Platform provides robust identity management features. It supports fully managed HCP identities, but also supports on-premise identity services (i.e.: Active Directory) as well as third-party cloud identity management services. These services store and mange user identities, along with role-based authorization maps to define authorized users’ resource access. Federation and Token-based Authentication: SAP supports traditional user authentication schemes (such as username and password), but also offers single sign-on. In conjunction with the identity management services above, HCP supports several token-based authenticators, including Open Authorization Framework (OAuth), Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML), and traditional X.509 certificates. A single login grants users access to all authorized applications from any location on any device. Data at Rest Encryption: Despite being an in-memory database, HCP leverages persistent (disk-based) storage. To protect this data HCP offers transparent Data Volume Encryption (DVE) as a native encryption capability for data within your database, as well as its transaction logs. You will need to configure these options because they are not enabled by default. If you run SAP Hana in an IaaS environment you also have access to several third-party transparent data encryption options, as well as encryption services offered directly by the IaaS provider. Each option has cost, security, and ease-of-use considerations. Key Store: If you are encrypting data, then somewhere encryption keys are in use. Anyone or any service with access to keys can encrypt and decrypt data, so your selection of a keystore to manage encryption keys is critical for both security and regulatory compliance. HCP’s keystore is fully integrated into its disk and log file storage capabilities, which makes it very easy to set up and manage. Organizations who do not trust their cloud service provider, as well as those subject to data privacy regulations which require they maintain direct control control of encryption keys, need to integrate on-premise key management with HCP. If you are running SAP Hana in an IaaS environment, you also have several third-party key management options – both in the cloud and on-premise – as well as whatever your IaaS provider offers. Management Plane: A wonderful aspect of Hana’s cloud service is full administrative capabilities through ‘Cockpit’, API calls, a web interface, or a mobile application. You can specify configuration, set deployment characteristics, configure logging, etc. This is a wonderful convenience for administrators, and a potential nightmare for security because an account takeover means your entire cloud infrastructure can be taken over and/or exposed. It is critical to disallow password access and leverage token-based access and two-factor authentication to secure these administrative accounts. If you are leveraging an IaaS provider you can disable the root administrator account, and assign individual administrators to specific SAP subcomponents or functions. These are foundational elements of an application security program, and we recommend leveraging the capabilities SAP provides. They work, and they reduce both the cost and complexity of managing cloud infrastructure. That said, SAP’s overarching security model leaves several large gaps which you will need to address with third-party capabilities. SAP publishes many of the security controls they implement for HCP, but these capabilities are not shared with tenants, nor is raw data. So for many security controls you must still provide your own. Areas you need to address include: Assessment: This is one of the most effective means of finding security vulnerabilities with on-premise applications. SAP’s scope and complexity make it easy to accidentally misconfigure insecurely. When moving to the cloud SAP takes care of many of these issues on your behalf. But even with SAP managing the underlying platform there are still add-on modules, configurations, and your own custom code to be scanned. Running on IaaS, assessment scans and configuration management remain a central piece of an application security program. You will need to adjust your deployment model because many of the more effective third-party scanners run as a standalone machine (in AWS, an AMI), while others run on a standalone central server supported by remote ‘agents’ which perform the actual scans. You will likely need to adjust your deployment model from what you use on-premise, because in the cloud you should not be able to address all servers from any single point within your infrastructure. Monitoring: SAP regularly monitors their own security logs for suspicious events, but they don’t share findings or tune their analysis to support your application security efforts, so you need to implement your own monitoring. Monitoring system usage is one security control you will rely on much more in the cloud, as your proxy for determining what is going on.

Share:
Read Post

Totally Transparent Research is the embodiment of how we work at Securosis. It’s our core operating philosophy, our research policy, and a specific process. We initially developed it to help maintain objectivity while producing licensed research, but its benefits extend to all aspects of our business.

Going beyond Open Source Research, and a far cry from the traditional syndicated research model, we think it’s the best way to produce independent, objective, quality research.

Here’s how it works:

  • Content is developed ‘live’ on the blog. Primary research is generally released in pieces, as a series of posts, so we can digest and integrate feedback, making the end results much stronger than traditional “ivory tower” research.
  • Comments are enabled for posts. All comments are kept except for spam, personal insults of a clearly inflammatory nature, and completely off-topic content that distracts from the discussion. We welcome comments critical of the work, even if somewhat insulting to the authors. Really.
  • Anyone can comment, and no registration is required. Vendors or consultants with a relevant product or offering must properly identify themselves. While their comments won’t be deleted, the writer/moderator will “call out”, identify, and possibly ridicule vendors who fail to do so.
  • Vendors considering licensing the content are welcome to provide feedback, but it must be posted in the comments - just like everyone else. There is no back channel influence on the research findings or posts.
    Analysts must reply to comments and defend the research position, or agree to modify the content.
  • At the end of the post series, the analyst compiles the posts into a paper, presentation, or other delivery vehicle. Public comments/input factors into the research, where appropriate.
  • If the research is distributed as a paper, significant commenters/contributors are acknowledged in the opening of the report. If they did not post their real names, handles used for comments are listed. Commenters do not retain any rights to the report, but their contributions will be recognized.
  • All primary research will be released under a Creative Commons license. The current license is Non-Commercial, Attribution. The analyst, at their discretion, may add a Derivative Works or Share Alike condition.
  • Securosis primary research does not discuss specific vendors or specific products/offerings, unless used to provide context, contrast or to make a point (which is very very rare).
    Although quotes from published primary research (and published primary research only) may be used in press releases, said quotes may never mention a specific vendor, even if the vendor is mentioned in the source report. Securosis must approve any quote to appear in any vendor marketing collateral.
  • Final primary research will be posted on the blog with open comments.
  • Research will be updated periodically to reflect market realities, based on the discretion of the primary analyst. Updated research will be dated and given a version number.
    For research that cannot be developed using this model, such as complex principles or models that are unsuited for a series of blog posts, the content will be chunked up and posted at or before release of the paper to solicit public feedback, and provide an open venue for comments and criticisms.
  • In rare cases Securosis may write papers outside of the primary research agenda, but only if the end result can be non-biased and valuable to the user community to supplement industry-wide efforts or advances. A “Radically Transparent Research” process will be followed in developing these papers, where absolutely all materials are public at all stages of development, including communications (email, call notes).
    Only the free primary research released on our site can be licensed. We will not accept licensing fees on research we charge users to access.
  • All licensed research will be clearly labeled with the licensees. No licensed research will be released without indicating the sources of licensing fees. Again, there will be no back channel influence. We’re open and transparent about our revenue sources.

In essence, we develop all of our research out in the open, and not only seek public comments, but keep those comments indefinitely as a record of the research creation process. If you believe we are biased or not doing our homework, you can call us out on it and it will be there in the record. Our philosophy involves cracking open the research process, and using our readers to eliminate bias and enhance the quality of the work.

On the back end, here’s how we handle this approach with licensees:

  • Licensees may propose paper topics. The topic may be accepted if it is consistent with the Securosis research agenda and goals, but only if it can be covered without bias and will be valuable to the end user community.
  • Analysts produce research according to their own research agendas, and may offer licensing under the same objectivity requirements.
  • The potential licensee will be provided an outline of our research positions and the potential research product so they can determine if it is likely to meet their objectives.
  • Once the licensee agrees, development of the primary research content begins, following the Totally Transparent Research process as outlined above. At this point, there is no money exchanged.
  • Upon completion of the paper, the licensee will receive a release candidate to determine whether the final result still meets their needs.
  • If the content does not meet their needs, the licensee is not required to pay, and the research will be released without licensing or with alternate licensees.
  • Licensees may host and reuse the content for the length of the license (typically one year). This includes placing the content behind a registration process, posting on white paper networks, or translation into other languages. The research will always be hosted at Securosis for free without registration.

Here is the language we currently place in our research project agreements:

Content will be created independently of LICENSEE with no obligations for payment. Once content is complete, LICENSEE will have a 3 day review period to determine if the content meets corporate objectives. If the content is unsuitable, LICENSEE will not be obligated for any payment and Securosis is free to distribute the whitepaper without branding or with alternate licensees, and will not complete any associated webcasts for the declining LICENSEE. Content licensing, webcasts and payment are contingent on the content being acceptable to LICENSEE. This maintains objectivity while limiting the risk to LICENSEE. Securosis maintains all rights to the content and to include Securosis branding in addition to any licensee branding.

Even this process itself is open to criticism. If you have questions or comments, you can email us or comment on the blog.