Earlier this week I was at the gym. I’d just finished a pretty tough workout and dropped down to the cafe area to grab one of those adult candy bars that tastes like cardboard and claims to give you muscles, longer life, and sexual prowess while climbing mountains. At least, that’s what I think they claim based on the pictures on the box. (And as a former mountain rescue professional, the technical logistics of the last claim aren’t worth the effort and potential injuries to sensitive bits).

Anyway, there was this woman in front of me, and her ordering process went like this:

  1. Ask for item.
  2. Ask for about 5-6 different options on said menu item, essentially replacing all ingredients.
  3. Look surprised when a number following a dollar sign appears on the little screen facing her on the cash register.
  4. Reach down to gym bag.
  5. Remove purse.
  6. Reach into purse.
  7. Remove wallet.
  8. Begin scrounging through change.
  9. See salad in cooler out of corner of eye.
  10. Say, “Oh! I didn’t see that!”
  11. Walk to cooler, leaving all stuff in front of register, with transaction in the middle.
  12. Fail to see or care about line behind her.

At this point, as she was rummaging through the pre-made salads, the guy behind the register looked at me, I looked at him, and we both subconsciously communicated our resignation as to the idiocy of the display in front of us. He moved over and unlocked the next register so I could buy my mountain-prowess-recovery bar, at which point the woman returned to the register and looked surprised that he was helping other (more decisive and prepared) customers.

One of my biggest pet peeves is people who lack awareness of the world around them. Which is most people, and probably explains my limited social life. But they probably hate judgmental sanctimonious jerks like me, so it all works out.

Just think about how many fewer security (and other) problems we’d have in the world if people would just swivel their damn heads and consider other people before making a turn? John Lennon should write a song about that or something.

On to the Summary:

Webcasts, Podcasts, Outside Writing, and Conferences

Favorite Securosis Posts

Other Securosis Posts

Favorite Outside Posts

Project Quant Posts

Research Reports and Presentations

Top News and Posts

Blog Comment of the Week

Remember, for every comment selected, Securosis makes a $25 donation to Hackers for Charity. This week’s best comment goes to Michael O’Keefe, in response to The Open Source Database Security Project.

Adrian – thanks for the reply. Maybe risk assessment wasn’t the right word – I was thinking of some sort of market analysis to determine which open source databases to focus on. I was using selection criteria like “total number of installations” and “total size in bytes”, etc, but user groups is indeed a good criterion to use, since you are targeting an audience of actual ordinary users, not mega companies like facebook and twitter that should be managing the security themselves.

Maybe these types of distributed databases (bigtable, Cassandra) should be the focus of separate project? A quick search of Securosis shows one mention of bigtable, so while I don’t want to expand the scope of the current project, these “storage systems” do offer some interesting security problems. For example here Peter Fleischer from Google discusses the difficulty in complying with the EU Data Protection Directive:

http://peterfleischer.blogspot.com/2009/04/cloud-policy-consequences-for-privacy.html

Share: