Blog

Building a Threat Intelligence Program [New Series]

By Mike Rothman

Security practitioners have been falling behind their adversaries, who launch new attacks using new techniques daily. Furthermore, defenders remain hindered by the broken negative security model of looking for attacks they have never seen before (well done, compliance mandates), and so consistently missing these attacks. If your organization hasn’t seen the attack or updated your controls and monitors to look for these new patterns… oh, well.

Threat Intelligence has made a significant difference in how organizations focus their resources. Our Applied Threat Intelligence paper highlighted how organizations can benefit from the misfortune of others and leverage this external information in use cases such as security monitoring/advanced detection, incident response, and even within some active controls to block malicious activity.

These tactical uses certainly help advance security, but we ended Applied Threat Intelligence with a key point: the industry needs to move past tactical TI use cases. The typical scenario goes something like this:

  1. Get hit with attack.
  2. Ask TI vendor whether they knew about attack before you did.
  3. Buy data and pump into monitors/controls.
  4. Repeat.

But that’s not how we roll. Our philosophy drives a programmatic approach to security. So it’s time to advance the use of threat intelligence into the broader and more structured TI program to ensure systematic, consistent, and repeatable value.

We believe this Building a Threat Intelligence Program report can act as the map to build this program and leverage threat intelligence within your security program. That’s what this new series is all about: turning tactical use cases into a strategic TI capability.

We’d like thank our potential licensee on this project, BrightPoint Security, who supports our Totally Transparent Methodology for conducting and publishing research. As always we’ll post everything to the blog first, and take feedback from folks who know more about this stuff than we do (yes, you).

The Value of TI

We have published a lot of research on TI, but let’s revisit the basics. What do we even mean when we say “benefiting from the misfortune of others”? Odds are that someone else will be hit by any attack before you. By leveraging their experience, you can see attacks without being directly attacked first, learning from higher profile targets. Those targets figure out how they were attacked and how to isolate and remediate the attack. With that information you can search your environment to see if that attack has already been used against you, and cut detection time. Cool, huh?

If you haven’t seen the malicious activity yet, it’s likely just a matter of time; so you can start looking for those indicators within your active controls and security monitors. Let’s briefly revisit the use cases we have highlighted for Threat Intelligence:

  • Active Controls: In this use case, threat intelligence gives you the information to block malicious activity using your active controls. Of course since you are actually blocking traffic, you’ll want to be careful about what you block versus what you merely alert on, but some activities are clearly malicious and should be stopped.
  • Security Monitoring: An Achilles’ Heel of security monitoring is the need to know what you are looking for. TI balances the equation a bit by expanding your view. You use the indicators found by other organizations to look for malicious activity within your environment, even if you’ve never seen it.
  • Incident Response: The last primary use case is streamlining incident response with TI. Once adversary activity is detected within your environment, you have a lot of ground to cover to find the root cause of the attack and contain it quickly. TI provides clues as to who is attacking you, their motives, and their tactics – enabling the organization to focus its response.

The TI Team

As mentioned above, TI isn’t new. Security vendors have been using dynamic data within their own products and services for a long time. What’s different is treating the data as something separate from the product or service. But raw data doesn’t help detect adversaries or block attacks, so mature security organizations have been staffing up threat intelligence groups, tasking them with providing context for which of the countless threats out there actually need to be dealt with now; and what needs to be done to prevent, detect, and investigate potential attacks. These internal TI organizations consume external data to supplement internal collection and research efforts, and their willingness to pay for it, which has created a new market for security data.

The TI Program

Organizations which build their own TI capability eventually need a repeatable process to collect, analyze, and apply the information. That’s what this series is all about. We’ll outline the structure of the program here, and dig into each aspect of the process in subsequent posts.

  1. Gathering Threat Intelligence: This step involves focusing your efforts on reliably finding intelligence sources that can help you identify your adversaries, as well as the most useful specific data types such as malware indicators, compromised devices, IP reputation, command and control indicators, etc. Then you procure the data you need and integrate it into a system/platform to use TI. A programmatic process involves identifying new and interesting data sources, constantly tuning the use of TI within your controls, and evaluating sources based on effectiveness and value.
  2. Using TI: Once you have aggregated the TI you can put it into action. The difference when structuring activity within a program is the policies and rules of engagement that govern how and when you use TI. Tactically you can be a little less structured about how data is used, but when evolving to a program this structure becomes a necessity.
  3. Marketing the Program: When performing a tactical threat intelligence initiative you focus on solving a specific problem and then moving on to the next. Broadening the use of TI requires specific and ongoing evaluation of effectiveness and value. You’ll need to define externally quantifiable success for the program, gather data to substantiate results, and communicate those results – just like any other business function.
  4. Sharing Intelligence: If there is one thing that tends to be overlooked when focusing on how the intelligence can help you, it is how sharing intelligence can help others… and eventually you again. A great irony, considering that the power of TI comes from organizations’ willingness to share information. But even assuming you do want to share TI, it needs to be safe and secure, to protect your interests and control organizational liability.

As we proceed through this series we will develop a plan you can use to build your own TI program.

No Related Posts
Comments

Mike,

TI seems to be new FUD marketing in the industry with so many players cropping up everywhere. Everyone claims to have deep Darknet presence that makes them the leader. Real value in TI is qualifying the intelligence specific to the market vertical and being able to standardize the distribution of this data, that can be easily and readily consumed by the Security teams and tools. Also, TI needs can sometimes be very specific to the organization, and it is my opinion that, specific threat activity that you see on your own defenses viz., perimeters, endpoints etc., is very valuable, and you need to build on that too. More often, than not, I have seen organizations completely ignore the TI that has been sitting in their own logs.

By Kiran


If you like to leave comments, and aren’t a spammer, register for the site and email us at info@securosis.com and we’ll turn off moderation for your account.