A few years ago our very own James Arlen presented at Black Hat on the security risks of high-speed trading.
Last week’s Federal Reserve announcement made big waves on Wall Street, sending markets skyrocketing and financial organizations scrambling to spread the news – but a new report raises concerns that some were spreading it faster than they should have. The high-speed trading experts at Nanex say they saw simultaneous reactions in both Washington D.C. and Chicago, when the news should have taken at least three milliseconds to travel the 600 miles from the Federal Reserve Building to the Chicago’s commodities exchanges.
I await Gunnar’s response, but it seems to me that ordinary people have little chance of surviving the markets as computers take over ‘our’ economy.
Reader interactions
2 Replies to “Cybercrime at the Speed of Light”
HFT is about trading, not investing. Traders buy and sell every second of every day.
Investors have multi year time horizons. That’s how ordinary should approach it, long term, buy and hold investment not as traders.
These events which continue to happen on a more regular basis and show no signs of stopping, are worrisome, for traders. They can bankrupt themselves with their own algorithms, as one of the biggest Knight Capital did last year
http://www.forbes.com/sites/halahtouryalai/2012/08/06/knight-capital-the-ideal-way-to-screw-up-on-wall-street/
I would argue its the reverse – traders and HFT are at risk to each other, but there is minimal risk to investors. They make millions of trades with very small returns.
So yes HFT is an annoyance for investors, because it clips a fraction of a percent off of trades, but on a 5-10 year time horizon its not even a rounding error.
Otoh, there’s mucho risk for the traders themselves, Knight Capital was one of the biggest and they bankrupted themselves with their own algorithms
http://www.forbes.com/sites/halahtouryalai/2012/08/06/knight-capital-the-ideal-way-to-screw-up-on-wall-street/