Blog

Multitenancy is the Least Interesting Security Property of Cloud Computing

By Rich

Today I was mildly snarky on the Security Metrics email list when a few people suggested that instead of talking about cloud computing we should talk about shared infrastructure. In their minds, ‘shared’ = ‘cloud’. I fully acknowledge that I may be misinterpreting their point, but this is a common thread I hear. Worse yet, very frequently when I discuss security risks, other security professionals key in on multitenancy as their biggest concern in cloud computing.

To be honest it may be the least interesting aspect of the cloud from a security perspective.

Shared infrastructure and applications are definitely a concern – I don’t mean to say they do not pose any risk. But multitenancy is more an emergent property of cloud computing rather than an essential characteristic – and yes, I am deliberately using NIST terms.

In my humble opinion – please tell me if I’m wrong in the comments – the combination of resource pooling (via abstraction) and orchestration/automation creates the greatest security risk. This is primarily for IaaS and PaaS, but also can apply to SaaS when it isn’t just a standard web app.

With abstraction and automation we add a management layer that effectively network-enables direct infrastructure management. Want to wipe out someone’s entire cloud with a short bash script? Not a problem if they don’t segregate their cloud management and harden admin systems. Want to instantly copy the entire database and make it public? That might take a little PHP or Ruby code, but well under 100 lines.

In neither of those cases is relying on shared resources a factor – it is the combination of APIs, orchestration, and abstraction.

These aren’t fully obvious until you start really spending time using and studying the cloud directly – as opposed to reading articles and research reports. Even our cloud security class only starts to scratch the surface, although we are considering running a longer version where we spend a bunch more time on it.

The good news is that these are also very powerful security enablers, as you will see later today or tomorrow when I get up some demo code I have been working on.

No Related Posts
Comments

Peter ven Eijk,

+1. And I love the Fantasia reference. It provides a vivid minds eye perspective

By Patrick McBride


Absolutely right.

Automation is like a multiplier of human effort. And it also multiplies human error.

A story from Walt Disney’s Fantasia comes to mind, where the scorcerer’s apprentice makes a minor mistakes in the orchestration layer.

By Peter van Eijk


If you like to leave comments, and aren’t a spammer, register for the site and email us at info@securosis.com and we’ll turn off moderation for your account.