I normally make fun of predictions, but two sets issued this week are well worth the reading.
The first come from Mike Rothman, who just issued his 2008 Security Incites. Mike mixes in both technical and general market trends. Some predictions are clearly measurable, and others are there just to make a point. Mike covers everything from metrics and audits, to NAC and DLP.
On the other side are the more-technical predictions by Nate Lawson and Thomas Ptacek. These two researcher powerhouses range from digital watermarking and DRM, to NAC and new vulnerability classes.
And let’s not forget Hoff’s double–sized predictions, and Stiennon’s.
These aren’t the kinds of things will will drive your security spending (unless they come true), and plenty of predictions overlap or contradict each other. But the point is to get you thinking about the year to come, especially as you make tactical decisions.
My predictions? I don’t really play that game, but if you aren’t looking towards better ways to protect yourself from web application attacks and clientside vulnerabilities, you’ll probably have a bad year.
<
p style=”text-align:right;font-size:10px;”>Technorati Tags: Mike Rothman, Nate Lawson, Security Predictions, Thomas Ptacek
Reader interactions
4 Replies to “Predictions Galore: Analyst vs. Researchers”
I must admit that Mike Rothman’s Pragmatic CSO newletters are very wordy and usually not all that “featureful”. And the Hoff seems to take things to the extreme when writing.
However, Mike’s Daily Incite is a must-read. It is a great summary of what is happening in the Security industry with some good comments and opinions. And some great links to more blogs and news stories. It is one of the blogs I read every time there is a new posting.
The Hoff’s posting show incredible insight and thought even if he does overstate things sometimes. But this leads to good debate which is not a bad thing at all.
I have no idea how these two find the time to research and write their blogs in as much detail as they do but I’‘m just very happy that they do.
I also am trying my hand at predictions but I am so slow in getting them onto my blog that 2009 will probably be here before I finish them.
Mike perks up a sometimes stale security scene with his own style and energy. Whether you agree with him, or not, he offers something to think about.
There is nothing wrong with his tongue-in- cheek, tip of the hat to his better half, or being a family man. More power to him. I am also not sure that someone who uses a handle that is the name of a nintendo character is in any position to tell anyone to “grow some”. 🙂
I learn from Mike all the time- he’s one of the best analysts out there. It just depends on what you’‘re looking for- he knows the security market inside out and I definitely consider him one of the few people to always read.
I stopped reading Rothman eight months ago. With all the information sources out there I have a simple test for keeping track of a magazines, blogs, or whatever. And that is: did I learn something or my way of thinking about something challenged in the last six months from this source? With Rothman the answer was clearly no. As well as his constantly referring to his wife as the “boss” grated on me. I mean – really – grow some will ya?