Summary: Age is wasted on the… middle aged

You may have noticed our posting was down a bit this week. Okay, pretty much non-existent. But take a look at the links in this Summary for what we have been reading and thinking about. This is turning out to be the busiest end-of-year I can remember for us. We always compress some things in Q4 as people use up end-of-year budget, but this year it is really hitting hard… and I am absolutely loving it. I have 3 papers to finish up before the end of the year, all of them on topics I am extremely interested in. Plus travel nearly every week. It will, of course, run me into the ground, but it looks like there will be plenty of time to remind the kids what I look like over the holidays, when I can bribe them. Our one post this week was Mike’s Incite, Youth is Wasted on the Young. While that is true, in my case I think age is wasted on the middle-aged. I didn’t barge out of college with a checklist of life goals quite like Mike. My graduation was more of a whimper. I spent 8 years as an undergrad, starting off in aerospace engineering and Navy ROTC with a clear path to being an astronaut, leaving as an itinerant paramedic and IT pro with a degree in history and an almost-finished second major in molecular biology. I don’t, for an instant, feel that I wasted my youth, missed opportunities, or failed to work to my peak potential. I needed to develop a lot as a person, like everyone, but managed to mostly avoid the deep pains and frustrations that Mike seems to have encountered. This wasn’t some genius superpower, but some incredible acts of fortune that brought amazing friends into my life to help me along. Martial arts also played a major role by developing self-awareness. That said, I did have a couple doozies, especially involving the finer gender, but nothing that didn’t launch me into something even more interesting. Age is wasted on the middle-aged because I have nearly as much enthusiasm, see just as much opportunity, but lack the freedom to pursue it as aggressively. I am not willing to risk my family’s lifestyle and home, and so am forced to proceed at a more methodical pace – which annoys the hell out of my 27-year-old self-image. But I don’t look at this with regret. I took full advantage of the opportunities I had at 27, and while I sometimes itch for more in my 40s, I know exactly what I would have to sacrifice to achieve them quickly, and I prefer this life. Besides, I am still egotistical enough to think I will achieve all my goals in time. And don’t go thinking I’m all zen or anything. Some of this bugs the hell out of me on a daily basis, but not to the point where I freak out over it. I suppose that’s progress… and sleep deprivation. On to the Summary: Webcasts, Podcasts, Outside Writing, and Conferences Adrian’s DR post on Evasion Techniques And Sneaky DBAs. Favorite Securosis Posts Adrian Lane: Youth is wasted on the young. The ‘halfway’ point realization is a sobering thought. No Other Securosis Posts this Week Favorite Outside Posts Adrian Lane: EMV vs the UPT, Can We Fix the #FAIL? Branden Williams points out one of the many reasons Chip and Pin is a long way off in the US. David Mortman: Identity Management and Its Role in Security Strategy of Enterprise Environments. Gal Shpantzer: Is the Affordable Health Care Website Secure? Probably not. James Arlen: SecTor 2013: Are there limits to ethical hacking? Mike Rothman: The Lie in the Network. Thought provoking post by the Rev. Baker about how we can’t count on the network for security and have to look at the issue differently. I will cover this in a longer post next week but it’s worth reading now. And I look forward to the next few posts to check out some of his ideas. Research Reports and Presentations A Practical Example of Software Defined Security. Continuous Security Monitoring. API Gateways: Where Security Enables Innovation. Identity and Access Management for Cloud Services. Dealing with Database Denial of Service. The 2014 Endpoint Security Buyer’s Guide. The CISO’s Guide to Advanced Attackers. Defending Cloud Data with Infrastructure Encryption. Network-based Malware Detection 2.0: Assessing Scale, Accuracy and Deployment. Quick Wins with Website Protection Services. Top News and Posts Forrester Contradicts Verizon Report, Says Insider Threat Leads Data Breaches. Call me skeptical. Alleged ‘Dread Pirate Roberts’ Heads to New York in Silk Road Case Nordstrom Finds Cash Register Skimmers Make your own Enigma Replica. Perfect high school project! Microsoft pays out $100,000 bounty for Windows 8.1 bug. Google’s Schmidt: Android more secure than iPhone. Not. Blog Comment of the Week This week’s best comment goes to louis vuitton belts, in response to about a dozen blog posts: You write well This has to be our most persistent and impressed reader ever. It’s really nice he or she feels this way about our work. Please keep the support coming – I’m sure we will approve one of your comments soon. Share:

Read Post

Totally Transparent Research is the embodiment of how we work at Securosis. It’s our core operating philosophy, our research policy, and a specific process. We initially developed it to help maintain objectivity while producing licensed research, but its benefits extend to all aspects of our business.

Going beyond Open Source Research, and a far cry from the traditional syndicated research model, we think it’s the best way to produce independent, objective, quality research.

Here’s how it works:

  • Content is developed ‘live’ on the blog. Primary research is generally released in pieces, as a series of posts, so we can digest and integrate feedback, making the end results much stronger than traditional “ivory tower” research.
  • Comments are enabled for posts. All comments are kept except for spam, personal insults of a clearly inflammatory nature, and completely off-topic content that distracts from the discussion. We welcome comments critical of the work, even if somewhat insulting to the authors. Really.
  • Anyone can comment, and no registration is required. Vendors or consultants with a relevant product or offering must properly identify themselves. While their comments won’t be deleted, the writer/moderator will “call out”, identify, and possibly ridicule vendors who fail to do so.
  • Vendors considering licensing the content are welcome to provide feedback, but it must be posted in the comments - just like everyone else. There is no back channel influence on the research findings or posts.
    Analysts must reply to comments and defend the research position, or agree to modify the content.
  • At the end of the post series, the analyst compiles the posts into a paper, presentation, or other delivery vehicle. Public comments/input factors into the research, where appropriate.
  • If the research is distributed as a paper, significant commenters/contributors are acknowledged in the opening of the report. If they did not post their real names, handles used for comments are listed. Commenters do not retain any rights to the report, but their contributions will be recognized.
  • All primary research will be released under a Creative Commons license. The current license is Non-Commercial, Attribution. The analyst, at their discretion, may add a Derivative Works or Share Alike condition.
  • Securosis primary research does not discuss specific vendors or specific products/offerings, unless used to provide context, contrast or to make a point (which is very very rare).
    Although quotes from published primary research (and published primary research only) may be used in press releases, said quotes may never mention a specific vendor, even if the vendor is mentioned in the source report. Securosis must approve any quote to appear in any vendor marketing collateral.
  • Final primary research will be posted on the blog with open comments.
  • Research will be updated periodically to reflect market realities, based on the discretion of the primary analyst. Updated research will be dated and given a version number.
    For research that cannot be developed using this model, such as complex principles or models that are unsuited for a series of blog posts, the content will be chunked up and posted at or before release of the paper to solicit public feedback, and provide an open venue for comments and criticisms.
  • In rare cases Securosis may write papers outside of the primary research agenda, but only if the end result can be non-biased and valuable to the user community to supplement industry-wide efforts or advances. A “Radically Transparent Research” process will be followed in developing these papers, where absolutely all materials are public at all stages of development, including communications (email, call notes).
    Only the free primary research released on our site can be licensed. We will not accept licensing fees on research we charge users to access.
  • All licensed research will be clearly labeled with the licensees. No licensed research will be released without indicating the sources of licensing fees. Again, there will be no back channel influence. We’re open and transparent about our revenue sources.

In essence, we develop all of our research out in the open, and not only seek public comments, but keep those comments indefinitely as a record of the research creation process. If you believe we are biased or not doing our homework, you can call us out on it and it will be there in the record. Our philosophy involves cracking open the research process, and using our readers to eliminate bias and enhance the quality of the work.

On the back end, here’s how we handle this approach with licensees:

  • Licensees may propose paper topics. The topic may be accepted if it is consistent with the Securosis research agenda and goals, but only if it can be covered without bias and will be valuable to the end user community.
  • Analysts produce research according to their own research agendas, and may offer licensing under the same objectivity requirements.
  • The potential licensee will be provided an outline of our research positions and the potential research product so they can determine if it is likely to meet their objectives.
  • Once the licensee agrees, development of the primary research content begins, following the Totally Transparent Research process as outlined above. At this point, there is no money exchanged.
  • Upon completion of the paper, the licensee will receive a release candidate to determine whether the final result still meets their needs.
  • If the content does not meet their needs, the licensee is not required to pay, and the research will be released without licensing or with alternate licensees.
  • Licensees may host and reuse the content for the length of the license (typically one year). This includes placing the content behind a registration process, posting on white paper networks, or translation into other languages. The research will always be hosted at Securosis for free without registration.

Here is the language we currently place in our research project agreements:

Content will be created independently of LICENSEE with no obligations for payment. Once content is complete, LICENSEE will have a 3 day review period to determine if the content meets corporate objectives. If the content is unsuitable, LICENSEE will not be obligated for any payment and Securosis is free to distribute the whitepaper without branding or with alternate licensees, and will not complete any associated webcasts for the declining LICENSEE. Content licensing, webcasts and payment are contingent on the content being acceptable to LICENSEE. This maintains objectivity while limiting the risk to LICENSEE. Securosis maintains all rights to the content and to include Securosis branding in addition to any licensee branding.

Even this process itself is open to criticism. If you have questions or comments, you can email us or comment on the blog.