Securosis

Menu

Research

Incite 5/7/2014: Accomplishments

Mike Rothman May 7, 2014 1 Comment

Yesterday I was in Winnipeg. By choice! I was invited to speak at the Western Canada Information Security Conference, and there isn’t much I like better than giving talks in Canada. Folks are nice. They appreciate when you come up to their towns to talk. They don’t say much during the pitch, but they come up after the session or in the coffee line and make it clear that they were listening. Just like in the Northeast. OK, not so much. I was doubly excited to do yesterday’s talk because they asked me to do my Happyness talk. It is my favorite talk to do – not because I think it provides a good message for the audience… even though it does. Not because it gives people tools to deal with the despondency that is part of the security profession… although it does that too. I love giving the Happyness talk because it forces me to take a look at where I’ve been and what I’ve done to improve myself over the past 7 years. When I first put the pitch together, I had a picture of Grumpy with the caption: “My alter ego.” When I updated the pitch last year, I changed that caption to be: “I used to be this guy.” That’s right, I’m no longer grumpy. Really. If you perceive me being grumpy, you bought into my persona. That’s not me anymore. If you met me today and didn’t know me, you wouldn’t think I’m grumpy or even curmudgeonly. I didn’t really appreciate that fact until I was going through the deck this week to do some minor tuning. I realized I have spent a long time trying to improve my mental game. To deal with my impatience and anger. To do this I embraced mindfulness practices (see the Neuro-hacking talks I do with JJ) and it has made a huge difference in my mental health. I need to celebrate that accomplishment. So I think I will. Of course that doesn’t mean I don’t get frustrated or impatient anymore. I’m human, contrary to popular belief. But I don’t hold onto the frustration, and the impatience passes quickly. Which, given where I started, is pretty cool. While I’m celebrating I should probably acknowledge how I have transformed my physical self as well. Back in 2006 I was 70 pounds heavier with high blood pressure and all sorts of other issues starting to manifest. So I decided I was tired of being fat and out of shape and dedicated myself to change. It has been a long process and it is still a daily battle, but at this point I am in the best shape of my life – in my mid-40s. Go figure. That warrants a celebration, no? I was on the express train to the grave and now I have a chance to live long enough for my kids to have to change my diapers. I don’t know how long I’ll be here, but when I go it won’t be because I didn’t take care of myself. So today I will celebrate my accomplishments, both mind and body. I don’t really ever pat myself on the back, so this is both new and uncomfortable. But I’ll do it because I should. Because hard work should be acknowledged – even if it is only acknowledging yourself. [5 minutes pass] OK, I’m done celebrating. There is work to do. Windmills to chase. Things to accomplish. But this is progress for me. I usually don’t celebrate accomplishments for even 5 minutes. It actually feels pretty good. Come to think of it, I highly recommend it. There may be something to this celebration thing… –Mike Photo credit: “Destination: Goal” originally uploaded by Jay Cox Securosis Firestarter Have you checked out our new video podcast? Rich, Adrian, and Mike get into a Google Hangout and.. hang out. We talk a bit about security as well. We try to keep these to 15 minutes or less, and usually fail. May 5 – There Is No SecDevOps April 28 – The Verizon DBIR April 14 – Three for Five March 24 – The End of Full Disclosure March 19 – An Irish Wake March 11 – RSA Postmortem Feb 21 – Happy Hour – RSA 2014 Feb 17 – Payment Madness Feb 10 – Mass Media Abuse Feb 03 – Inevitable Doom 2014 RSA Conference Guide In case any of you missed it, we published our fifth RSA Conference Guide back in February. Yes, we do mention the conference a bit, but it’s really our ideas about how security will shake out in 2014. You can get the full guide with all the memes you can eat. Heavy Research We are back at work on a variety of blog series, so here is a list of the research currently underway. Remember you can get our Heavy Feed via RSS, with our content in all its unabridged glory. And you can get all our research papers too. Understanding Role-based Access Control Advanced Concepts Introduction NoSQL Security 2.0 Understanding NoSQL Platforms Introduction Newly Published Papers Advanced Endpoint and Server Protection Defending Against Network-based DDoS Attacks Reducing Attack Surface with Application Control Leveraging Threat Intelligence in Security Monitoring The Future of Security Security Management 2.5: Replacing Your SIEM Yet? Defending Data on iOS 7 Eliminating Surprises with Security Assurance and Testing Incite 4 U Dropping your stuff: The Intralinks folks just published some interesting research, highlighted on Graham Cluley’s blog, showing how Dropbox and Box leak links to private files through Google searches. They prove their point by showing a 2012 tax return and a mortgage application. That’s awesome. It turns out anyone with a link for private sharing can see the file. No authentication needed. More awesome. The issue can also manifest if someone clicks a link embedded within a document viewed using Dropbox’s web preview function, because that link is included in the referrer information. So how do you solve the problem? Don’t share links. Duh. Oh, not an issue? Use business cloud storage services, which allow you to restrict access to shared links. We are only beginning to scratch the surface

Share:
Read Post
dinosaur-sidebar

Research

view all

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Totally Transparent Research is the embodiment of how we work at Securosis. It’s our core operating philosophy, our research policy, and a specific process. We initially developed it to help maintain objectivity while producing licensed research, but its benefits extend to all aspects of our business.

Going beyond Open Source Research, and a far cry from the traditional syndicated research model, we think it’s the best way to produce independent, objective, quality research.

Here’s how it works:

  • Content is developed ‘live’ on the blog. Primary research is generally released in pieces, as a series of posts, so we can digest and integrate feedback, making the end results much stronger than traditional “ivory tower” research.
  • Comments are enabled for posts. All comments are kept except for spam, personal insults of a clearly inflammatory nature, and completely off-topic content that distracts from the discussion. We welcome comments critical of the work, even if somewhat insulting to the authors. Really.
  • Anyone can comment, and no registration is required. Vendors or consultants with a relevant product or offering must properly identify themselves. While their comments won’t be deleted, the writer/moderator will “call out”, identify, and possibly ridicule vendors who fail to do so.
  • Vendors considering licensing the content are welcome to provide feedback, but it must be posted in the comments - just like everyone else. There is no back channel influence on the research findings or posts.
    Analysts must reply to comments and defend the research position, or agree to modify the content.
  • At the end of the post series, the analyst compiles the posts into a paper, presentation, or other delivery vehicle. Public comments/input factors into the research, where appropriate.
  • If the research is distributed as a paper, significant commenters/contributors are acknowledged in the opening of the report. If they did not post their real names, handles used for comments are listed. Commenters do not retain any rights to the report, but their contributions will be recognized.
  • All primary research will be released under a Creative Commons license. The current license is Non-Commercial, Attribution. The analyst, at their discretion, may add a Derivative Works or Share Alike condition.
  • Securosis primary research does not discuss specific vendors or specific products/offerings, unless used to provide context, contrast or to make a point (which is very very rare).
    Although quotes from published primary research (and published primary research only) may be used in press releases, said quotes may never mention a specific vendor, even if the vendor is mentioned in the source report. Securosis must approve any quote to appear in any vendor marketing collateral.
  • Final primary research will be posted on the blog with open comments.
  • Research will be updated periodically to reflect market realities, based on the discretion of the primary analyst. Updated research will be dated and given a version number.
    For research that cannot be developed using this model, such as complex principles or models that are unsuited for a series of blog posts, the content will be chunked up and posted at or before release of the paper to solicit public feedback, and provide an open venue for comments and criticisms.
  • In rare cases Securosis may write papers outside of the primary research agenda, but only if the end result can be non-biased and valuable to the user community to supplement industry-wide efforts or advances. A “Radically Transparent Research” process will be followed in developing these papers, where absolutely all materials are public at all stages of development, including communications (email, call notes).
    Only the free primary research released on our site can be licensed. We will not accept licensing fees on research we charge users to access.
  • All licensed research will be clearly labeled with the licensees. No licensed research will be released without indicating the sources of licensing fees. Again, there will be no back channel influence. We’re open and transparent about our revenue sources.

In essence, we develop all of our research out in the open, and not only seek public comments, but keep those comments indefinitely as a record of the research creation process. If you believe we are biased or not doing our homework, you can call us out on it and it will be there in the record. Our philosophy involves cracking open the research process, and using our readers to eliminate bias and enhance the quality of the work.

On the back end, here’s how we handle this approach with licensees:

  • Licensees may propose paper topics. The topic may be accepted if it is consistent with the Securosis research agenda and goals, but only if it can be covered without bias and will be valuable to the end user community.
  • Analysts produce research according to their own research agendas, and may offer licensing under the same objectivity requirements.
  • The potential licensee will be provided an outline of our research positions and the potential research product so they can determine if it is likely to meet their objectives.
  • Once the licensee agrees, development of the primary research content begins, following the Totally Transparent Research process as outlined above. At this point, there is no money exchanged.
  • Upon completion of the paper, the licensee will receive a release candidate to determine whether the final result still meets their needs.
  • If the content does not meet their needs, the licensee is not required to pay, and the research will be released without licensing or with alternate licensees.
  • Licensees may host and reuse the content for the length of the license (typically one year). This includes placing the content behind a registration process, posting on white paper networks, or translation into other languages. The research will always be hosted at Securosis for free without registration.

Here is the language we currently place in our research project agreements:

“Content will be created independently of LICENSEE with no obligations for payment. Once content is complete, LICENSEE will have a 3 day review period to determine if the content meets corporate objectives. If the content is unsuitable, LICENSEE will not be obligated for any payment and Securosis is free to distribute the whitepaper without branding or with alternate licensees, and will not complete any associated webcasts for the declining LICENSEE. Content licensing, webcasts and payment are contingent on the content being acceptable to LICENSEE. This maintains objectivity while limiting the risk to LICENSEE. Securosis maintains all rights to the content and to include Securosis branding in addition to any licensee branding.”

Even this process itself is open to criticism. If you have questions or comments, you can email us or comment on the blog.